Health care's big spending mismatch
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
The health care services that rack up the highest out-of-pocket costs for patients aren't the same ones that cost the most to the health care system overall.
Why it matters: Americans likely have a distorted view of what is costing them the most, which affects where consumers direct their ire after receiving expensive medical bills.
What they're saying: "What you pay for health care is often more influenced by your health insurance than the actual cost of the service," Avalere's Chris Sloan said.
- "It's hard to have consumer-driven market forces that impact costs if the consumer doesn’t understand how much any service costs and subsequently can’t 'shop around' or negotiate it down," Sloan added.
- It also means that certain issues, like prescription drug spending, become politically elevated over other areas with lower cost-sharing.
Yes, but: Insurance was designed in part to shield patients from high health care bills, which typically are largest when a patient goes to the hospital. But most people don't go to the hospital in any given year.
- And cost-sharing was designed to encourage enrollees from inappropriately using health care, even though it's become a way of off-loading costs onto patients.
- "Most people are not itching to get admitted to the hospital, so it doesn’t make sense for insurance plans to discourage it through cost-sharing," said the Kaiser Family Foundation's Larry Levitt.
The bottom line: The health care costs that are hitting patients' pocketbooks hardest aren't the same ones that are driving health care spending through the roof, meaning that political action to address costs may be somewhat divorced from our long-term problems.
