Aug 9, 2017

Why we still haven’t solved the health care cybersecurity problem

Rebecca Zisser / Axios

It's been a few months since the worldwide WannaCry ransomware attacks, and a month and a half since the NotPetya attacks that hit U.S. hospitals and the drug company Merck. The cyberattacks were bad enough to get the attention of the health care industry — and the rest of us — but not bad enough to force the industry to solve the underlying problems.

The bottom line: A cyberattack that takes down multiple hospital systems is "the thing that keeps me up at night," said Richard Staynings, principal and cybersecurity healthcare leader at Cisco. "I have no way of knowing the last time a patient received their medication … It essentially renders hospitals near useless."

Here's what's changed and what still hasn't, according to cybersecurity experts.

Changed:

  • Hospitals and other health care facilities have been reluctant to install security patches on devices that have to be available at all times, like CT scanners. But they're becoming more open to it "now that the risk equation has changed significantly," meaning it's clearly more dangerous to be vulnerable to an attack than to take a device offline, according to Staynings.
  • Hospital officials are generally more aware of the importance of cybersecurity. "I think they're interested — I'm not sure they understand what they should be doing," said David Damato, chief security officer at the cybersecurity startup Tanium.

Not changed:

  • Health care organizations still don't spend a lot on cybersecurity, compared to traditional priorities like doctors and researchers. "Health care is now an easy target compared to financial services," said Staynings.
  • It's an increasingly urgent issue as more and more software is added, especially at smaller facilities that don't have a lot of money to spend, said Bryan Sivak, a former chief technology officer at the Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Electronic health records are becoming a big worry. You don't want someone getting in and changing a patient's blood type, for example, or getting access to highly sensitive personal information about them.
  • Old or unpatched operating systems will always leave health care facilities vulnerable. "We've been talking about this for decades and are still running into the same problems," said Sivak.
  • Facilities have to learn to segment their networks, or divide them into subnetworks to make them more secure. (That's a tough task, though, if they don't have a lot of IT resources.)
  • Vendors have to be more willing to patch their medical devices — some don't want to change them for risk of losing their certifications from the Food and Drug Administration. And the FDA "has sat on the fence on this issue, quite frankly, for the last few years," said Staynings.

Go deeper

Coronavirus stress tests drug industry's dependence on China

A Hong Kong commuter wears a face mask. Photo: Miguel Candela/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

It's unclear whether the rapid spread of the novel coronavirus will actually result in prescription drug shortages, but it has undoubtedly highlighted the potential vulnerabilities of having the supply chain for American drugs so dependent on China.

Driving the news: About 150 prescription drugs — including antibiotics, generics and some branded drugs without alternatives — are at risk of shortage if the coronavirus outbreak in China worsens, per two sources familiar with a list of at-risk drugs compiled by the Food and Drug Administration.

Go deeperArrow47 mins ago - Health

Bernie's path to the presidency

Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks yesterday during a rally at Houston University. Photo: Mark Felix/AFP via Getty Images

Lots of Democrats are in full panic that Bernie Sanders will win the nomination and get clobbered in the general election — and bring the party down, too. But the evidence, particularly the polling, doesn't back those doomsday warnings.

Why it matters: Virtually every national and swing state poll shows Sanders tied with or beating President Trump.  And, unlike every rival, he has a huge base of fervent, unshakable supporters he can only grow.

These swing voters don't like Trump’s environmental rollbacks

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Swing voters in four battleground states decisively oppose President Trump’s sweeping rollbacks of environmental regulations — but it’s unlikely to sway their votes.

Why it matters: It’s voters living in states like these, including Florida and Pennsylvania, who fill pivotal roles electing America’s presidents, so we should listen.