Jun 20, 2019

Chinese A-shares escape the trade war trap

Dion Rabouin, author of Markets
Expand chart
Data: Factset; Chart: Axios Visuals

While China's most well-known equity indexes have underperformed this year, its onshore stocks — so-called A-shares — have driven returns well above the U.S. and index maker MSCI's all-world stock index.

What it means: The A-shares are primarily domestic companies and therefore less exposed to the U.S.-China trade war.

  • Asha Mehta, an emerging and frontier market portfolio manager at Acadian Asset Management, told me last year that was a big reason she was leading her firm’s new China A-shares fund, the second asset manager to get licensed for A-share market access. She said that she was expecting the fund to draw $2 billion in assets.
  • Unfortunately for most investors, they are still little owned by those outside of China. But that's changing quickly.

What's happening: Researchers at the IMF reported Wednesday that aggregate portfolio inflows to China had more than tripled to $159 billion in 2018 from $50 billion in 2016, with overseas purchases of A-shares "especially strong."

  • "Add the widely expected inclusion of Chinese bonds and equities into FTSE and JP Morgan indexes, and China can expect to see benchmark-driven portfolio inflows of as much as $450 billion, or 3 percent to 4 percent of GDP, in the next two to three years," analysts wrote.
  • "These preliminary estimates may be conservative."

Go deeper: The trade war isn't breaking China's economy

Go deeper

Trump says he will campaign against Lisa Murkowski after her support for Mattis

Trump with Barr and Meadows outside St. John's Episcopal church in Washington, D.C. on June 1. Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump tweeted on Thursday that he would endorse "any candidate" with a pulse who runs against Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).

Driving the news: Murkowski said on Thursday that she supported former defense secretary James Mattis' condemnation of Trump over his response to protests in the wake of George Floyd's killing. She described Mattis' statement as "true, honest, necessary and overdue," Politico's Andrew Desiderio reports.

4 hours ago - World

The president vs. the Pentagon

Trump visits Mattis and the Pentagon in 2018. Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty

Over the course of just a few hours, President Trump was rebuffed by the Secretary of Defense over his call for troops in the streets and accused by James Mattis, his former Pentagon chief, of trampling the Constitution for political gain.

Why it matters: Current and former leaders of the U.S. military are drawing a line over Trump's demand for a militarized response to the protests and unrest that have swept the country over the killing of George Floyd by police.

New York Times says Tom Cotton op-ed did not meet standards

Photo: Avalon/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

A New York Times spokesperson said in a statement Thursday that the paper will be changing its editorial board processes after a Wednesday op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), which called for President Trump to "send in the troops" in order to quell violent protests, failed to meet its standards.

Why it matters: The shift comes after Times employees began a coordinated movement on social media on Wednesday and Thursday that argued that publishing the op-ed put black staff in danger. Cotton wrote that Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act in order to deploy the U.S. military against rioters that have overwhelmed police forces in cities across the country.