President Trump waving to the press. Photo: Oliver Douliery-pool/Getty Images

President Trump tweeted that he has the "absolute right" to pardon himself in any investigation on Monday morning after personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani argued he "probably does" have the right to do so.

The big picture: Some legal experts are blasting the president for suggesting that he'd be able to pardon himself and some are saying that there are ways he could pardon himself or be pardoned.

What they're saying
  • Trump administration counselor Kellyanne Conway appeared on Fox News and said it doesn't matter whether Trump can pardon himself:
"To ask whether President Trump will pardon himself is a ridiculous question because you would only pardon yourself if you’ve done something wrong."
  • Senator Chuck Grassley told CNN Trump needs to find a new lawyer:
"If I were president of the United States and I had a lawyer that told me I could pardon myself, I think I would hire a new lawyer."
  • In a tweet, Senator Richard Blumenthal said Trump pardoning himself would be "unthinkable":
"Only in a two-bit tin horn totalitarian dictatorship could the President even consider pardoning himself from all accountability. "
  • Senator Ed Markey looked to a DOJ ruling for clarity on the issue and said Trump can't pardon himself in a tweet:
"'Under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case, the President cannot pardon himself,' – DOJ Office of Legal Counsel, 4 days before Nixon resigned."
  • House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Trump never explicitly said that he'd pardon himself. He also added he doesn't think a president should ever pardon themselves:
"The president is not saying he is going to pardon himself. The president never said he pardoned himself...I don't think a president should pardon themselves."
  • Paula Reid of CBS said Trump isn't able to pardon himself based on a DOJ ruling, but Vice President Mike Pence can.

Go deeper: What we know about Trump's self-pardon power.

Go deeper

Appeals court allows House Democrats to continue lawsuit for Don McGahn testimony

Don McGahn in an October 2018 Cabinet meeting. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

A D.C. appeals court on Friday allowed House Democrats to continue their case for testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn before the House Judiciary Committee.

Why it matters: The ruling has broader implications beyond this specific instance, agreeing that Congress has the standing to sue to enforce subpoenas against executive branch officials even if the White House refuses to comply.

There's little consensus on TikTok's specific national security threat

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

TikTok has become a Rorschach test for how U.S. politicians view China, with little consensus on the specifics of its threat to homeland security.

The big picture: Much of what D.C. fears about TikTok is fear itself, and that's reflected in President Trump's executive order to ban the app by Sept. 20 if it's not sold by parent company ByteDance — alongside another focused on Chinese messaging app WeChat and its parent company Tencent.

U.S. sanctions Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam

Photo: Anthony Kwan/Getty Images)

The Treasury Department on Friday placed sanctions on Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam, following months of tension as she has allowed continued overreach by Beijing to subvert Hong Kong's autonomy.

Why it matters: It's the toughest sanction yet imposed on China for its destruction of Hong Kong’s relatively free political system.