Sign up for our daily briefing

Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Denver news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Des Moines news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Minneapolis-St. Paul news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tampa Bay news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Charlotte news in your inbox

Catch up on the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

HHS Secretary Alex Azar and President Trump. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The Trump administration this morning will finalize new rules for "short-term" insurance plans — one of its most significant steps yet to chip away at the Affordable Care Act's insurance markets.

The big picture: Short-term plans are cheap, and offer few benefits. They appeal mainly to healthy people, and that's why the Obama administration limited the plans — to keep healthy people in the ACA's exchanges. The Trump administration is moving hard in the other direction.

How it works: The new regulations will allow a "short-term" plan to last up to a year, and consumers will be able to keep them for as long as three years, senior Health and Human Services officials said.

  • The Obama administration, by contrast, only allowed people to have these plans for three months at a time.
  • Short-term plans don't have to meet the ACA's benefit requirements. They can deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions, don't have to cover any specific set of benefits, and can cap how much they'll pay in a year.
  • As a result, they're cheap.

“We don't expect there to be significant migration away from the exchanges," Jim Parker, an HHS senior adviser, told reporters.

  • HHS says it's expecting roughly an additional 600,000 people to buy the policies this year, eventually ramping up to 1.6 million. It thinks only about 200,000 of those people would have otherwise used the exchanges.
  • If that's the case, it would likely be because premium increases have driven so many healthy people out of the ACA's marketplaces already. People who don't get a subsidy to help pay their premiums are fleeing the exchanges, and people who do get a subsidy would be unlikely to give it up.

Yes, but: Even if only 200,000 people leave the exchanges for these plans, this regulation isn't happening in a vacuum. It comes on top of the nullification of the individual mandate, the cuts to enrollment outreach, and the separate (less controversial) rules expanding association health plans.

The bottom line: Taken together, all of these steps clearly steer healthy people away from the ACA and toward other options, all but giving up on the balanced risk pool the Obama administration had hoped to create.

Go deeper

The rebellion against Silicon Valley (the place)

Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Smith Collection/Gado via Getty Images

Silicon Valley may be a "state of mind," but it's also very much a real enclave in Northern California. Now, a growing faction of the tech industry is boycotting it.

Why it matters: The Bay Area is facing for the first time the prospect of losing its crown as the top destination for tech workers and startups — which could have an economic impact on the region and force it to reckon with its local issues.

Erica Pandey, author of @Work
1 hour ago - Economy & Business

Telework's tax mess

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

As teleworkers flit from city to city, they're creating a huge tax mess.

Why it matters: Our tax laws aren't built for telecommuting, and this new way of working could have dire implications for city and state budgets.

Wanted: New media bosses, everywhere

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Reuters, HuffPost and Wired are all looking for new editors. Soon, The New York Times will be too.

Why it matters: The new hires will reflect a new generation — one that's addicted to technology, demands accountability and expects diversity to be a priority.

You’ve caught up. Now what?

Sign up for Mike Allen’s daily Axios AM and PM newsletters to get smarter, faster on the news that matters.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!