Illustration: Sarah Grillo / Axios

The future of Toys "R" Us may be determined tomorrow in a Virginia bankruptcy court hearing that one source tells me will be "explosive."

At issue will be whether liquidation of the entire U.S. business will proceed as the only option (per preference of the "B-4 lender" group) or if a parallel process can continue whereby different debtors can keep working to find a strategic or financial partner that would save around 200, strong-performing U.S. stores (via a merger with the company's much-healthier Canada business).

  • Thousands of jobs hang in the balance.
  • A liquidator bidding process also needs to be established, particularly because the job is likely too large for any one firm (even if those 200 U.S. stores are saved).
Big picture

A narrative is beginning to take hold about how Toys "R" Us is emblematic of private equity's corrosive leverage model, and how a few more big busts could fuel populist anger against the buyout bunch. Just today, Apollo-backed Claire's filed for Chapter 11.

But I don't really see it, at least not without a much broader economic pullback. Remember that both Toys and Claire's were pre-crisis deals, and there just aren't too many of those still in PE portfolios. Most of today's retail buyouts are being viewed as salvage jobs from the outset (e.g., Staples), so the downside PR risk should be far smaller. Moreover, plenty of other PE-backed retailers with large debt loads have managed to survive and, in some cases, even thrive.

This isn't to say PE did a good job managing Toys. It didn't. Many of the stores never lost their Sears-like aesthetic, nor did the company adequately work with smaller toy-makers who create differentiated product.

So if you want to blame private equity — as opposed to Amazon or a group of seemingly-intransigent lenders — blame it more for execution than model.

Go deeper

1 hour ago - Podcasts

Facebook boycott organizers share details on their Zuckerberg meeting

Facebook is in the midst of the largest ad boycott in its history, with nearly 1,000 brands having stopped paid advertising in July because they feel Facebook hasn't done enough to remove hate speech from its namesake app and Instagram.

Axios Re:Cap spoke with the boycott's four main organizers, who met on Tuesday with CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other top Facebook executives, to learn why they organized the boycott, what they took from the meeting, and what comes next.

Boycott organizers slam Facebook following tense virtual meeting

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Civil rights leaders blasted Facebook's top executives shortly after speaking with them on Tuesday, saying that the tech giant's leaders "failed to meet the moment" and were "more interested in having a dialogue than producing outcomes."

Why it matters: The likely fallout from the meeting is that the growing boycott of Facebook's advertising platform, which has reached nearly 1000 companies in less than a month, will extend longer than previously anticipated, deepening Facebook's public relations nightmare.

Steve Scalise PAC invites donors to fundraiser at Disney World

Photo: Kevin Lamarque-Pool/Getty Images

House Minority Whip Steve Scalise’s PAC is inviting lobbyists to attend a four-day “Summer Meeting” at Disney World's Polynesian Village in Florida, all but daring donors to swallow their concern about coronavirus and contribute $10,000 to his leadership PAC.

Why it matters: Scalise appears to be the first House lawmakers to host an in-person destination fundraiser since the severity of pandemic became clear. The invite for the “Summer Meeting” for the Scalise Leadership Fund, obtained by Axios, makes no mention of COVID-19.