Sign up for our daily briefing

Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on the day's biggest business stories

Subscribe to Axios Closer for insights into the day’s business news and trends and why they matter

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Stay on top of the latest market trends

Subscribe to Axios Markets for the latest market trends and economic insights. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Sports news worthy of your time

Binge on the stats and stories that drive the sports world with Axios Sports. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tech news worthy of your time

Get our smart take on technology from the Valley and D.C. with Axios Login. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Get the inside stories

Get an insider's guide to the new White House with Axios Sneak Peek. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Denver news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Des Moines news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Twin Cities news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Tampa Bay news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Charlotte news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios

Somewhere in the human-computer nexus, two brand-new Boeing aircraft have crashed shortly after takeoff, with the loss of 346 lives. One conclusion: We can't assume that adding more technology to our lives will make us safer.

Why it matters: The way that Boeing and the FAA approach the latest crisis should provide a blueprint not only for the aviation industry, but also for autonomous vehicles and many other technologies taking over human decision-making — even the algorithm determining what you watch next on YouTube.

Our thought bubble, from Axios editor-in-chief Nicholas Johnston: Too much computer can be anodyne, like Waze directing me off a highway when it erroneously thinks there's a jam up ahead. But it can also be a Boeing flying into the ground because it's confused about a stall.

What we don’t know: The big unknowns in aviation right now:

  1. What caused Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 to crash on Sunday, killing all 157 people on board?
  2. Is the 737 MAX safe?
  3. Why didn't Boeing immediately ground the 737 MAX until it found out the answer to the first two questions?

The answers to the first two questions are known unknowns. We know that we don't know the answer; we can also be reasonably certain that an answer is forthcoming. The black box will be found, the aircraft's data will be retrieved (somewhere), and we will find out what went wrong.

The answer to the third question is harder, given that a safety-first reputation is the most valuable asset that Boeing possesses.

  • What we do know: Pilots have registered complaints about the 737 MAX in a federal database, and they've criticized the training too. The Dallas Morning News reports that one captain called the flight manual "inadequate and almost criminally insufficient."
  • By the numbers: Until we find out what went wrong, we have two simple fatality statistics to guide us. Air travel in general is incredibly safe, thanks to technology, but air travel on the 737 MAX is not. The plane has been flying for less than two years, and it has already crashed twice. That's unprecedented in modern aviation history.

Be smart: The proof of the pudding — the reason why we know that technology has made air travel safer — is right there in the statistics. You don't need to know anything about ground proximity warning systems or wind shear alerts to know that planes have been getting safer, you can just look at the numbers.

It was reasonable to believe that the 737 MAX was safe before it crashed twice. All modern aircraft are safe. But then that assumption was tested in real-world conditions, and now it must be re-examined in the light of new evidence.

  • Boeing said it has "full confidence in the safety of the 737 MAX" — before it has seen the data from the Ethiopian Airways black box, but after 346 people have died. That statement is going to make it very hard for the public and regulators to trust the company's safety statements in future.
  • The New York Times reports that the FAA has outsourced safety designations on Boeing aircraft to Boeing's own employees, in a textbook case of regulatory capture.

This is bigger than just aviation. Technology has made cars, too, much safer over time. But it's dangerous to mindlessly extrapolate that tendency into the future.

Like aircraft manufacturers, carmakers design redundant sensors and fail-safe technology into their vehicles to maximize safety, Axios' Joann Muller reports.

  • Automated vehicles need human monitoring, just as planes do. But without proper training and education, drivers — or pilots— are unprepared to deal with situations where something goes wrong.
  • Mark Rosekind, chief safety innovation officer at Zoox, an autonomous vehicle startup, told Joann the crash sounds like another example of “mode confusion” – where the pilot (or the driver, in the case of an AV) doesn’t understand what the machine is doing and is “literally battling the computer in the cockpit.”
  • "We’re adding complexity and technology to make it do its job better, but if you don’t design around what the human is capable of doing, and their limitations, it ends up creating more risk,” said Rosekind, who's also a former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The bottom line: When evidence emerges that a technology is not safe, that's the time to re-examine a lot of priors about technology making us safer. That goes for planes, it goes for cars, and it even goes for social networks.

Go deeper:

Go deeper

Dems race to address, preempt stimulus fraud claims

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Biden officials are working to root out the systematic fraud in unemployment and Paycheck Protection Program claims that plagued the Trump administration’s efforts to boost the economy with coronavirus relief money, Gene Sperling told House committee chairmen privately this week.

Why it matters: President Biden just signed another $1.9 trillion of aid into law, with Sperling tapped to oversee its implementation. And the administration is asking Congress to approve another $2.2 trillion for the first phase of an infrastructure package.

1 hour ago - Politics & Policy

Scoop: Biden close to picking Nick Burns as China ambassador

Nicholas Burns. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Nicholas Burns, a career diplomat, is in the final stages of vetting to serve as President Biden’s ambassador to China, people familiar with the matter tell Axios.

Why it matters: Across the administration, there's a consensus the U.S. relationship with China will be the most critical — and consequential — of Biden's presidency. From trade to Taiwan, the stakes are high. Burns could be among the first batch of diplomatic nominees announced in the coming weeks.

Biden's Russian sanctions likely to achieve little

President Biden announces new sanctions against Russia. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Despite bold talk from top administration officials, there's little reason to think the Russia sanctions package President Biden announced Thursday will do anything to alter Russian President Vladimir Putin's behavior or calculus.

Why it matters: While it's true some elements of the package — namely, the targeting of Russia's sovereign debt — represent significant punitive measures against Moscow, it leaves plenty of wiggle room for the Russian president.