Illustration:Rebecca Zisser/Axios

Three technology privacy cases coming before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court this month will begin to clarify how a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling affects law enforcement access to cellphone records and wireless data.

Why it matters: These are the first tests of how the Supreme Court's ruling in Carpenter v. United States — which decided that law enforcement must obtain a search warrant before getting cellphone location data — will be applied in cases around the country. The verdicts will set the tone for how cases like these are handled around the country.

The backdrop

The Carpenter case, decided in June 2018, stemmed from police seizures of thousands of cellphone location records from Timothy Carpenter, who was convicted of robberies between 2010 and 2011.

  • The conviction he received was handed over "partly on data from Carpenter's cell phone providers," Axios' Sam Baker reported.

The bottom line: Kade Crockford, director at the Technology of Liberty Program at the ACLU's Massachusetts branch, told Axios the core problem in the 21st century is "technology changes so fast, and the law doesn't."

"People have been using cellphones in this country for over 20 years, and only [in June 2018] did we finally get a decision at the Supreme Court...That is a very slow development of privacy law."
The state of play

The three cases on the docket in Massachuseetts are Commonwealth v. Almonor, v. Johnson, and v. Feliz.

  • Commonwealth v. Almonor deals with "law enforcement's ability to acquire precise, real-time location information from a cell phone," the ACLU's Massachusetts chapter explains.
  • Commonwealth v. Johnson asks whether law enforcement should be allowed to obtain GPS location data from a tracking monitor required during a probational period, after the person who had worn it is no longer on probation.
  • Commonwealth v. Feliz, according to the ACLU, "asks whether the government can mandate the ankle shackling of all 'non-contact' sex offenders...even if there is no individualized reason to justify the tracking."
The big picture

Nathan Freed Wessler, ACLU staff attorney with the Speech, Privacy and Technology project, told Axios that these cases represent "a pretty ground-shaking clarification of how the Fourth Amendment protects our privacy in the digital age."

"These cases are providing an opportunity for appellate courts to start applying the lessons from U.S. v Carpenter. The court in Carpenter could not have been more clear that our interpretation of the Fourth Amendment...need to take into account of changes of technology and the radical new powers that technological advances give the government to invade people's privacy."
— ACLU staff attorney Nathan Freed Wessler

The other side: Jake Wark, spokesman for the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office, which is handling Feliz, told Axios that when someone is convicted of a crime, that person's expectation of privacy has "been reasonably diminished."

"It's not that the expectation of privacy has been entirely wiped out, it's that it's been reasonably diminished. ... As you're charged with a crime, you have a somewhat diminished expectation of privacy. If you're convicted of a crime, the expectation of privacy is diminished even further."

Go deeper

8 hours ago - World

China-Iran deal envisions massive investments from Beijing

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

China and Iran have negotiated a deal that would see massive investments flow into Iran, oil flow out, and collaboration increase on defense and intelligence.

Why it matters: If the proposals become reality, Chinese cash, telecom infrastructure, railways and ports could offer new life to Iran’s sanctions-choked economy — or, critics fear, leave it inescapably beholden to Beijing.

Updated 8 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 7 p.m. ET: 13,048,249 — Total deaths: 571,685 — Total recoveries — 7,215,865Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 7 p.m. ET: 3,353,348— Total deaths: 135,524 — Total recoveries: 1,031,856 — Total tested: 40,282,176Map.
  3. World: WHO head: There will be no return to the "old normal" for foreseeable future — Hong Kong Disneyland closing due to surge.
  4. States: Houston mayor calls for two-week shutdownCalifornia orders sweeping rollback of open businesses — Cuomo says New York will use formula to determine if reopening schools is safe.
  5. Education: Los Angeles schools' move to online learning could be a nationwide tipping point.

House Judiciary Committee releases transcript of Geoffrey Berman testimony

Geoffrey Berman. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee on Monday released the transcript of its closed-door interview with Geoffrey Berman, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan who was forced out by Attorney General Bill Barr last month.

Why it matters: House Democrats have seized on Berman's testimony, in which he claimed the attorney general sought to "entice" him into resigning so that he could be replaced by SEC chairman Jay Clayton, to bolster allegations that the Justice Department has been politicized under Barr.