Oct 10, 2019

T-Mobile-Sprint merger deal approaches next hurdles

Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios

Opponents of the T-Mobile-Sprint merger are piling on the deal in the hopes of convincing a judge the Justice Department’s settlement isn’t good enough.

Why it matters: The DOJ’s agreement with the wireless companies has to receive final sign-off from Judge Timothy J. Kelly of the D.C. District Court, and critics want to make it a tough decision.

Driving the news: The comment period is closing this week for the DOJ’s deal, which will see the wireless companies sell assets to satellite TV company Dish so it can enter the wireless market.

  • But a group of economists — including Hal Singer, managing director at Econ One, and Nicholas Economides, an NYU economics professor — argue that this fix won’t restore the competition that will be lost when nation’s third and fourth largest carriers merge.
  • "The DOJ is going to have a hard time here defending this mess,” Singer said in an interview. “Even though this judge can’t block the merger per se, he can conclude that the remedy is deficient. If that is the best remedy the DOJ can come up with, that would be tantamount to blocking the merger."
  • The Communications Workers of America urged the Justice Department to abandon the settlement in its comments, arguing that the deal is not in the public interest.

The odds: Historically, the federal court review of a merger settlement has been an uneventful affair.

  • But U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon — who stymied the DOJ's attempt to block the AT&T-Time Warner merger — also raised concerns this year about the DOJ’s consent decree in the CVS-Aetna merger and held a hearing before ultimately allowing it.
  • Merger opponents are hoping the DOJ’s settlement will get similar scrutiny.

Meanwhile: New York is leading a coalition of 16 states and D.C. in a separate lawsuit to block the merger. The states filed a brief with the D.C. court reviewing the settlement urging the judge to hold off on a decision until the states’ case plays out in New York. That case is set to go to trial in December.

  • T-Mobile and Sprint have agreed not to close their merger until the state litigation is resolved
  • The state attorney general of Mississippi withdrew his opposition to the merger this week after negotiating commitments from the companies.

What's next: The DOJ is collecting the settlement comments and will file them with the court, along with a response.

  • "In almost every case, the court rubber stamps the consent decree," said Joel Mitnick, a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. "Conceivably, a court could reject a consent decree if they find it’s not in the public interest ... but I can’t remember the last time a court has just rejected a consent decree."

Go deeper

FCC approves T-Mobile-Sprint deal

The T-Mobile logo is seen outside a shop in Washington, D.C. Photo: Alastair Pike/AFP/Getty Images

The FCC formally approved the T-Mobile-Sprint merger, with both Democrats at the commission voting against the deal Wednesday.

Why it matters: The companies needed federal approval of the merger from the FCC. The approval from the expert agency in the space could aid the wireless companies as they fight a lawsuit from a coalition of states determined to block the merger.

Go deeperArrowOct 16, 2019

Second-term Supreme Court cases to watch

Photo: Nurphoto/Getty Images

The Supreme Court, now with a solid conservative majority after Justice Brett Kavanaugh's appointment, is hearing cases that could have long-term ramifications on immigration, LGBTQ employment protections and access to abortion.

The big picture: The high court — with 5 conservatives and 4 liberals — kept a relatively low profile in its first term this year. But it could hand major wins to Republicans in 2020's second term, emboldened by Kavanaugh's appointment and sharpening their focus as a slew of hot-button disputes work their way up from lower courts.

Key cases to watchArrowUpdated Oct 18, 2019

Parsing Trump's latest climate tussle with California

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

The battle between the Trump administration and California over climate policy further escalated on Wednesday.

Driving the news: The Justice Department, in a new lawsuit, alleges the state's emissions-trading system is an unconstitutional foray into the federal government's foreign affairs role thanks to the state's partnership with the Canadian province of Quebec.

Go deeperArrowOct 24, 2019