Updated Jul 3, 2018

How the next Supreme Court justice could change Medicaid

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The next Supreme Court justice could usher in significant changes to Medicaid, giving states far more power to cut the program.

The issue: Many conservative lawyers and judges say private entities — like health care providers — shouldn't be able to sue over Medicaid's coverage decision. If that view ultimately prevails, states could make much bigger cuts without the threat of a lawsuit.

"A right without a remedy is not a right.”
— Rodney Whitlock, health care lobbyist

Where it stands: The Supreme Court ruled in 1990, in Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Association, that providers can sue over inadequate payment rates. Kennedy dissented from that ruling, and later helped to narrow its scope — but the court never fully closed the door on provider lawsuits.

  • Kennedy “was willing to leave the courthouse doors open in Medicaid cases, whereas the conservative majority is willing to shut it – I mean, really slam it," said Sara Rosenbaum, a George Washington University law professor.

The impact: Kennedy's replacement could be the fifth vote to shut providers out entirely.

  • Conservatives including Justice Clarence Thomas and the late Antonin Scalia, have argued that Medicaid is a contract between states and the federal government, and that the law doesn't give individuals the right to sue for the entitlements the statute requires. Only HHS should decide whether a state is out of line, they've said.
  • If the right to sue goes away, “it's certainly possible that a state would start hacking away at its program. There would be no deterrence at all," Rosenbaum said.

What we're watching: This issue could find its way back to the court relatively soon. Kansas and Lousiana have asked the Supreme Court to hear cases regarding about whether they can exclude Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid programs, and whether Planned Parenthood can sue over that exclusion.

  • Two federal appeals courts said the states couldn't exclude Planned Parenthood. But a third appeals court ruled that Planned Parenthood doesn't have the right to sue Arkansas over the same issue.

Go deeper

Trump's clemency spree

Rod Blagojevich in 2010. Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images

President Trump announced Tuesday that he commuted former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich's 14-year prison sentence for extortion, bribery and corruption — as well as issuing full pardons for former San Francisco 49ers owner Edward DeBartolo Jr., former NYPD Commissioner Bernie Kerik and financier Michael Milken.

The big picture: The president's clemency spree largely benefitted white-collar criminals convicted of crimes like corruption, gambling fraud and racketeering, undercutting his message of "draining the swamp."

Go deeperArrowUpdated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Trump's improbable moonshot

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

NASA is unlikely to meet its deadline of sending astronauts to the surface of the Moon by 2024, even with a large influx of funding.

Why it matters: The Artemis mission to send people back to the Moon is the Trump administration's flagship space policy, and its aggressive, politically-motivated timeline is its hallmark.

Go deeperArrow3 hours ago - Science

Justice Department says U.S. attorneys are reviewing Ukraine information

Rudy Giuliani. Photo: Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) Tuesday informing him that the U.S. attorneys for the Eastern District of New York and the Western District of Pennsylvania are reviewing "unsolicited" information from the public related to matters involving Ukraine.

Why it matters: Nadler had requested an explanation for the "intake process" that Attorney General Bill Barr stated had been set up in order to receive information that Rudy Giuliani had obtained about the Bidens in Ukraine.