HELP's top Democrat and Republican, Patty Murray and Lamar Alexander, at a hearing. Photo: Alex Brandon/AP

Republicans and Democrats on the Senate HELP Committee disagree about the how far they should go in overhauling the Affordable Care Act's "state innovation waivers" — a dispute that could spell trouble for the committee's bipartisan talks about how to shore up the ACA.

The committee's public hearings have focused mainly on non-controversial changes to the waiver process. But private negotiations, HELP Chairman Lamar Alexander has talked more explicitly about making more substantial changes, a senior GOP aide said. Alexander wants to make it easier for states to waive some of the ACA's consumer protections and benefit mandates — which Democrats would staunchly oppose.

The ACA allows states to waive some of its requirements, as long as they can prove that they could still cover just as many people, with plans that are just as generous, without increasing federal spending. In effect, those "guardrails" keep states from tinkering with many of the law's consumer protections.

While the committee's public hearings have focused largely on more minor changes to the waiver process, Alexander has been pushing in negotiations for more substantial changes to the guardrails. Alexander has said Democrats will need to make concessions in order for Republicans to fund the ACA's cost-sharing subsidies, but hasn't been explicit about what they would be.

"Dems need to strike a deal with Alexander which means meaningful change to guardrails," the senior GOP aide told me.

In contrast: "Democrats have been clear from the start that rolling back protections around affordability and coverage isn't something we're willing to do—so the fact that some Republicans are more concerned with notching a political win on Obamacare than lowering health care costs for families is certainly a challenge," a Democratic aide said.

Background: Many Republicans are highly averse to any stabilization effort that could come across as an ACA "bailout," and many of them are sick of dealing with health care in general. See Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch's op-ed on the subject from last week.

Go deeper

Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

  1. Politics: Chris Christie: Wear a mask "or you may regret it — as I did" — Senate Democrats block vote on McConnell's targeted relief bill.
  2. Business: New state unemployment filings fall.
  3. Economy: Why the stimulus delay isn't a crisis (yet).
  4. Health: FDA approves Gilead's remdesivir as a coronavirus treatment How the pandemic might endMany U.S. deaths were avoidable.
  5. Education: Boston and Chicago send students back home for online learning.
  6. World: Spain and France exceed 1 million cases.

Early voting eclipses 2016 total with 12 days until election

People stand in line to vote early in Fairfax, Virginia in September. Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Americans have cast more than 47.1 million ballots in the 2020 presidential election, surpassing the total early-vote count for 2016 with 12 days left until Election Day, according to a Washington Post analysis of voting data.

Why it matters: The election is already underway, as many states have expanded early and mail-in voting options because of the coronavirus pandemic.

What to expect from the final debate of the 2020 election

Trump and Biden at the first debate. Morry Gash-Pool/Getty Image

Watch for President Trump to address Joe Biden as “the big guy” or “the chairman” at tonight's debate as a way of dramatizing the Hunter Biden emails. Hunter's former business partner Tony Bobulinski is expected to be a Trump debate guest.

The big picture: Trump's advisers universally view the first debate as a catastrophe — evidenced by a sharp plunge in Trump’s public and (more convincingly for them) private polling immediately following the debate.