April 09, 2024
Good afternoon … Wondering where the Senate AI working group's report is? We've got a much-needed update for you.
📜 Situational awareness: Rep. Adam Schiff today introduced the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act, which would require companies to be transparent about the use of copyrighted work to train their systems.
1 big thing: Senate AI working group report likely in May
Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios
The Senate AI working group's report likely will come out in May as the chamber faces a tight spring calendar and senators jockey to include various priorities, Maria and Ashley report.
Why it matters: Passing AI legislation will require broad, bipartisan support, and the timeline is getting tougher.
- The new wrinkle of a bipartisan, bicameral privacy bill that many are hoping is the baseline for any AI legislation adds complexity to the tech policy landscape on Capitol Hill.
Driving the news: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is expected to release an AI report soon that draws on the lessons of last year's AI Insight Forums and offers a roadmap for committees to legislate.
- Sources said the report has either been finished or is nearly finished, and some were expecting it to come earlier.
- Sen. Mike Rounds, one of the lawmakers Schumer tapped to lead the bipartisan AI forums, had told Ashley the group would release it as early as March.
- But the Senate's schedule is packed the next couple of weeks, and another recess is coming up.
Schumer spokesperson Allison Biasotti said the majority leader is "proud" of ongoing committee-level work.
- "As laid out from the beginning, Schumer — along with Sens. Rounds, [Todd] Young and [Martin] Heinrich — has sought to use the AI Insight Forums and the forthcoming policy roadmap to help stoke legislative consensus and supplement the traditional committee process."
Behind the scenes: Sources inside and outside Capitol Hill told Axios some senators are dissatisfied with how the process has unfolded.
- Senators have taken issue with not being able to ask questions during the forums and with the fact that they were held behind closed doors.
- Some Senate staffers told Axios they had expected their members on relevant AI committees to have more transparency into the report.
What they're saying: "Basically everyone who isn't Schumer, Young, Rounds and Heinrich is less than pleased with the entire process," one source said.
- "There's a sense among a lot of the folks in the different committees that there's a little bit of bogarting of territory here."
How it works: Although AI touches nearly all facets of society, the most relevant committees are Commerce, Intelligence, Homeland Security and Judiciary.
- Ultimately, it's Schumer's call when the report comes out and what goes in it.
Our thought bubble: Schumer wants AI legislation to replicate how the CHIPS Act came together, in a bipartisan way from the beginning.
- But AI is more likely to fracture senators, who each have their own take because the technology could affect so many aspects of life.
2. What we're hearing: Senate AI report frustration
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
"Congress is pretty educated on the AI issues…. It seems like a green light that is being delayed when the committees have a clear sense of what their jurisdictions can tackle."— A Senate staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the frustration growing among members of pertinent committees that the AI report isn't out yet
3. Exclusive: Civil rights group taps AI advisory council
Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios
A major civil rights advocacy group today will announce an advisory council of civil society leaders and academics to help shape AI policy.
Why it matters: The Center for Civil Rights and Technology's advisory council, shared first with Maria, will help drive AI policy with equity at the forefront.
Council members include:
- The Leadership Conference for Civil and Human Rights' Alondra Nelson
- The AFL-CIO's Amanda Ballantyne
- UnidosUS' Janet Murguía
- The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law's Damon Hewitt
- National Education Association's Rebecca Pringle
- National Fair Housing Alliance's Lisa Rice
- Gates Foundation's Clarence Wardell III
- Asian Americans Advancing Justice's John C. Yang
The council also includes academics from Haverford College, Brown University, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, GW Law School, University of California, Berkeley and Northeastern University.
What they're saying: "The perspectives from the academic community will be essential to guiding the civil rights community through this era of unprecedented challenges and opportunities," said Leadership Conference Education Fund CEO Maya Wiley.
- The center is part of the Leadership Conference Education Fund and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.
✅ Thank you for reading Axios Pro Policy, and thanks to editors Mackenzie Weinger and David Nather and copy editor Brad Bonhall.
- Do you know someone who needs this newsletter? Have them sign up here.
View archive


