Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Early global and national lessons of COVID-19 are already being used to plot a path to preventing the next pandemic.
Why it matters: As hard as it might be to accept, we're no less at risk for another infectious disease pandemic now than we were at the start of COVID-19. Unless we revamp how the international community monitors infectious disease and bolster our national defenses, the next one could be even worse.
What's happening: On Thursday the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) released the first broad, bipartisan investigation into how the world failed on COVID-19, and how it can shore up its defenses against the inevitable next global disease.
- The failures began with China, which dissembled early about the extent of the new disease, and with the WHO, which didn't press Beijing for transparency and initially underplayed the threat of what would become COVID-19.
- But while those failures "explain how a local outbreak became a global pandemic," as CFR President Richard Haass writes in the report, the fact remains that the U.S. government bears major responsibility for how much worse COVID-19 has been here than in many other comparable countries.
Context: CFR's recommendations fall into two main areas: global and national.
- We need what Thomas Bollyky, director of CFR's global health program, terms a "sentinel network" in health care facilities around the world that can rapidly share data about any new diseases, as well as enhanced UN coordination to help ensure countries don't cover up outbreaks.
- That will require funding of international health at a scale that currently doesn't exist — the WHO's entire $2.4 billion budget is less than some major U.S. hospitals, and less than 1% of total foreign aid for health goes to pandemic preparedness.
On the national side, CFR distinguishes between failures of preparation and failures of response — both of which hobbled the U.S.
- The U.S. has underfunded pandemic preparation for years, and in the 2020 fiscal year budget the government allocated just $547 million to global health security threats, compared to $750 billion for the U.S. military overall.
- Funding for the CDC's Public Health Emergency Preparedness cooperative agreement has decreased by more than 25% since 2002, while over the past decade local public health departments — the foot soldiers of disease response — have cut more than 50,000 staff because of budget cutbacks.
What they're saying: While the U.S. was far from ready when the pandemic came, "I'm still surprised we didn't do better at containment," says Bollyky.
- A pandemic, unlike nearly every other natural disaster, is a truly national catastrophe, yet Washington left it to "states to largely figure it out for themselves," writes Haass, to the point where governors were competing for scarce protective equipment.
- Far from providing a unified message, the national government has too often been a font of misinformation, with a recent study identifying President Trump himself as as the single largest driver of the "infodemic."
- Without a national system for testing and tracing, "we had to shut down everywhere," says Bollyky, creating enormous economic pain that more nimble nations like Singapore and South Korea were able to avoid.
What's next: From the top, the White House needs to designate a senior official who can act as a focal point for global health.
- A national surveillance program for testing and tracing needs to be put in place and kept in place for the next disease, as well as building up a Strategic National Stockpile of medicine and equipment.
- Internationally, the U.S. should work to reform the WHO — rather than leave it, as the Trump administration has promised — and reassert international leadership on global health surveillance.
"The next pandemic could easily emerge imminently, even while the current pandemic is still raging. It could easily be worse than the one we have today. So the time to move forward is now. "— Thomas Bollyky
What to watch: The rapid progress on COVID-19 vaccines is the one real bright spot in this pandemic, but will the international community figure out a way to rapidly and equitably distribute them?
- The early signs aren't looking good.