Nov 15, 2019

What lower prices would mean for drug companies

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

Drug pricing regulations would not decimate the pharmaceutical industry, according to an analysis from health policy researchers at West Health and Johns Hopkins.

Why it matters: This throws some cold water on Big Pharma's claims that new drug research and investments would evaporate if the federal government limits what they can charge for medications — the proposal du jour in Congress and the White House.

Details: The report from West Health, a policy group only funded by telecom moguls Mary and Gary West, found that drug companies have the highest profits of any industry when calculated as a "return on invested capital." And those profits would still be among the top if drug sales were reduced through federal negotiations or price caps.

  • "Pharma will still have this high rate of profitability, but it's also less volatile than other industries," said Sean Dickson, a health policy director at West Health and co-author of the report. "The demand for drugs is inelastic — people need to take them to stay alive."

Yes, but: Some economists and analysts criticized the report's methods — for example, focusing on publicly traded drug companies while leaving out smaller, failed drug firms could skew profitability. And while pension funds and institutional investors would not abandon pharma, the industry likely would change how and where to spend research dollars.

  • The Congressional Budget Office estimated Rep. Nancy Pelosi's bill would prevent eight to 15 new drugs from coming to market in the next decade.
  • However, CBO didn't say whether that reduction involved important drugs, or less valuable drugs (like "me-too" medications).

PhRMA, the industry's primary lobbying group, said the authors are "naive" to claim drug pricing regulations "would not have a devastating impact on research and development," and that "excluding smaller biotech companies from the analysis demonstrates a rudimentary understanding of the drug development process."

  • "Pharmaceutical companies will still need to invest in new drugs in order to earn revenue — it's their entire business model," Dickson said in response. "They could maintain their current research investments and still be enormously profitable."

The bottom line: Our reporting similarly shows that pharmaceutical companies easily hold the highest profits and margins in health care alone. It makes sense, considering these companies are granted patent monopolies for their products.

  • Changing the way drug prices are set does not mean profits, or research, would cease to exist. The debate is over the magnitude of pharmaceutical profits, and what would happen if those levels are reduced.

Go deeper

The strange bedfellows opposing drug-pricing bills across the U.S.

A group opposing drug pricing measures around the country includes major pharmaceutical companies as well as large construction-industry unions, the New York Times reports — strange bedfellows, to say the least.

Why it matters: Ads run by the Pharmaceutical Industry Labor-Management Association may confuse public perception of the nature of opposition to drug-pricing measures.

Go deeperArrowDec 4, 2019

Big Pharma keeps its status quo after USMCA deal

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

Pharma didn't get what it wanted on trade, but it's still doing just fine.

The big picture: In this political climate, with this much scrutiny on drug prices, preserving the status quo is an enormous victory for this incredibly powerful industry. And though it failed to win a new victory on trade, the status quo is perfectly intact.

Go deeperArrowDec 11, 2019

Impeachment hasn't dulled Trump's interest in drug prices

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

The Trump administration is pushing ahead with its drug pricing agenda even as impeachment sucks up all the political oxygen, with plans to advance some of its most ambitious regulations and to work with Congress on legislation.

Why it matters: Drug pricing remains a huge issue that both parties want to run on in 2020. For Trump, there's a lot of pressure: His most ambitious proposals have either been tabled, are tied up in the courts or have yet to be implemented.

Go deeperArrowNov 25, 2019