The environmental impact of Fluffy and Rover
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
The 163 million dogs and cats in the U.S. ate one-quarter of the 94.3 billion pounds of meat the country produced in 2015, or as much as 62 million Americans did, according to estimates by UCLA professor Gregory Okin.
Why it matters: Raising that meat generated greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 64 million tons of carbon dioxide, or as much as the yearly emissions of 12.3 million passenger vehicles. U.S. pet ownership has increased since 2015 when the pet census was taken and Okin made his calculations. As the number of pets has increased, so have emissions.
By the numbers: In 2018, there were...
- 188 million dogs and cats in China
- 19 million in India
- 18.5 million in Japan
- 16.5 million in Canada
- 16.5 million in the United Kingdom
Yes, but: Because cats are carnivores, animal-nutrition specialists believe going vegetarian or vegan is not a healthy option.
- As omnivores, dogs benefit from a mixed diet that includes a certain amount of animal protein depending on the breed.
What's new: More pets are increasingly feasting on high-end foods, which contain high-quality meat and require more land, water, fossil fuels, phosphate, biocides and pesticides to produce.
Owners can shrink their pets' dietary footprint by reducing the amount they're fed.
- Veterinarians classified more than 100 million dogs and cats as overweight or obese in 2018.
- Owners can also feed their pets lower-quality proteins, as dogs and cats can happily chow on meat byproducts, such as marrow, kidneys and spleen, left from processing meat for humans.
- Environment-conscience prospective pet owners might consider adopting animals with smaller carbon footprints like birds, rodents and some reptiles.
The bottom line: “This analysis does not mean that dog and cat ownership should be curtailed for environmental reasons, but neither should we view it as an unalloyed good,” UCLA's Okin concludes.