Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Oracle this week challenged the Department of Defense’s decision to award a major, $10-billion cloud computing contract to just one company as "anti-competitive," according to a 40-page challenge document obtained by Axios and originally reported by The Washington Post.

Why it matters: Several industry leaders have expressed concerns that the proposal is written to favor Amazon. Oracle has already been vocal about its concerns with this contracting process this year.

Why now: Companies have until September 17 to contest it, and it comes just two weeks after the final request for proposals came out.

What they're saying:

  • Oracle argues the Pentagon’s current strategy of using just one cloud would strain the military’s technical standing. Part of Oracle's concern is it is standard commercially to use a multi-cloud environment to allow for redundancy and resiliency, which, in military operations would be particularly crucial in case of failure.
"DoD's single awardee...contract approach is...contrary to DoD's own stated objectives of flexibility, innovation, a broad industrial base, and keeping pace with evolving technology."
— Oracle's bid challenge
  • Oracle claims the single award setup would "frustrate" competition. The contract, which would last for 10 years, is so long that competitors also raise the concern that the Pentagon could get locked in to a bad business deal.

The background:

  • When the Pentagon contracted out with a company linked with Amazon earlier this year, called REAN Cloud, Oracle contested it and the Government Accountability Office sided with Oracle.
  • The CIA has contracted out cloud computing services with just Amazon. IBM, another likely bidder, protested the deal in 2013, but Amazon prevailed.

Go deeper

Updated 19 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Tim Scott says Trump "misspoke" when he told Proud Boys to "stand by"

Photo: Bonnie Cash/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) told reporters on Wednesday that he believes President Trump "misspoke" when he told the far-right "Proud Boys" group to "stand back and stand by" in response to a question about condemning white supremacy at the first presidential debate.

Catch up quick: Moderator Chris Wallace asked Trump on Tuesday, "Are you willing, tonight, to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down?" Trump asked who specifically he should condemn, and then responded, "Proud Boys, stand back and stand by. But I'll tell you what, somebody's got to do something about antifa and the left."

Updated 27 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Commission on Presidential Debates wants changes

Photos: Jim Watson and Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

The Commission on Presidential Debates announced Wednesday that it plans to implement changes to rules for the remaining debates, after Tuesday night's head-to-head between Joe Biden and Donald Trump was practically incoherent for most of the night.

What they are saying: "Last night's debate made clear that additional structure should be added to the format of the remaining debates to ensure a more orderly discussion of the issues," the CPD said in a statement.

Trump says he doesn't know who Proud Boys are after telling them to "stand by"

President Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he doesn't know who the "Proud Boys" are, after saying at the presidential debate last night that the far-right group should "stand back and stand by" in response to a question asking him to condemn white supremacists.

Why it matters: The comments set off outrage and calls for clarification from a number of Republican senators. After being asked several times on Wednesday whether he will condemn white supremacy, Trump responded: "I have always denounced any form — any form of any of that, you have to denounce. But I also — Joe Biden has to say something about antifa."