Axios Markets

July 03, 2025
đź‘‹ Welcome back! Emily here. We're almost in the clear to the long weekend. But first, we've got a jam-packed edition, with analysis on who benefits from the "big, beautiful bill" now headed for a final vote in the house.
- Another heads-up: Today's the last day you'll see my name at the top of the newsletter. I'm handing the reins to Madison Mills, our new senior markets reporter at Axios.
- Don't fret, I'm sticking with Axios and moving to a new role as a national correspondent to write for a broader range of newsletters. Got any story ideas for me? Send an email. I always love to hear from you.
🎇 Reminder: We're off tomorrow for July 4th. See you back here Monday!
All in 1,140 words, a 4-minute read.
1 big thing: "Big, beautiful bill" has break for seniors
The "big, beautiful bill" features a new tax break for older Americans who pay taxes on Social Security income. But there's a significant catch.
Why it matters: The break leaves out the poorest seniors, and the very rich ones, too.
How it works: Both the House and Senate bills include an increased tax deduction for tax filers age 64 and older. In the Senate version, the new deduction is $6,000 for individuals and $12,000 for couples.
- The deduction starts phasing out for those who earn over $75,000 ($150,000 for couples), and phases out completely at $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples, in the Senate version.
- The break expires in 2028 when President Trump leaves office, as do a few other White House priorities in the bills, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on auto loan interest.
What they're saying: "This amounts to the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," per a report out earlier this week from the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
Yes, but: Most seniors — 64% of them — don't pay taxes on Social Security, according to the White House's own analysis.
- Those who can't afford the taxes already don't pay. This break targets most, but not all, of the rest.
Between the lines: Trump promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security income. Lawmakers couldn't pull that off entirely, given the constraints of passing a reconciliation bill and changing Social Security law.
- This break comes close. After adding the recipients of the new tax break, 88% of seniors wouldn't pay Social Security tax, per the White House.
- "The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers on President Trump's promise of no tax on Social Security," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson says in a statement, noting the analysis by the Council of Economic Advisers.
Zoom out: For those upper-middle class folks who pay taxes on retirement benefits, this is a "substantial tax break," says Marc Goldwein, senior policy director for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that advocates for fiscal responsibility.
- For the several million senior citizens who live in poverty, and already don't pay taxes on Social Security, this doesn't help.
- The bill would also accelerate Social Security and Medicare insolvency by a year, to 2032, per an analysis from the CRFB.
The bottom line: Seniors in the U.S. overall are doing great financially right now, sitting on assets that have soared in value in recent years.
- "As a whole seniors in this country are the wealthiest cohort in the history of the known universe," Goldwein says.
- If this bill passes, then they'll get to keep a little bit more.
2. Sector winners and losers from the megabill
Manufacturing and defense companies stand to win from the "big, beautiful bill," while wind and solar fare worse and hospitals could be hit hard.
Why it matters: Investors welcome the certainty, but are also nervous about heavily exposed sectors.
The big picture: Companies will get expanded provisions on itemization and expenses, including 100% bonus depreciation, which allows business to deduct expenses immediately rather than over three years.
- Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners says this could benefit manufacturers, although the stimulative effects of the bill could be muted by tariffs on things like steel and aluminum.
- "The John Deeres and Caterpillars of the world benefit from a 100% bonus depreciation" historically, she says.
Defense spending also benefits, as armed services spending is set to increase by $150 billion under the bill.
- Couple that with the administration's push to grow the defense budget to over $1 trillion annually and it's a boost in spending that "markets do not appreciate…at all," says Terry Haines, founder of Pangaea Policy.
The other side: While a proposed tax on wind and solar projects was taken out of the bill, tax credits are still set to be removed.
- Tax credits are key to the economics of solar installation investments, and "for many in that sector, this bill would represent their fears confirmed," per a statement from John Gimigliano, principal in charge of federal tax legislative and regulatory services at KPMG U.S.
- The removal of a $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit is also set to be a headwind for EV sales.
Hospitals have "just gotten absolutely smoked, so much so that quite frankly there's no way that these cuts go into effect," according to Treyz.
- The Congressional Budget Office has estimated $1.1 trillion in health care cuts from the bill. This could weigh on hospital REITs that benefited from that government spending.
- The loss of social safety nets for millions of Americans could be an additional pressure point to the broader economy over time.
The bottom line: "Whatever you think of the bill, these folks have created a lot more certainty in the markets," Haines at Pangea says.
3. Wall Street's "smart money" accepts the bill


Bond investors are supposed to wag their fingers at runaway government spending, so a megabill set to increase the deficit by over $3 trillion would typically send them into a tailspin.
- But that's not happening. In fact, bonds just had their best first half of the year in five years.
Why it matters: Following its role in President Trump's reversal on tariff policy, the bond market has been viewed as a check on the administration.
- If U.S. debt holders are relaxed about a record deficit, that may eliminate one obstacle to government spending plans.
What they're saying: "I've been so shocked by the bond market's complacency in response to this bill," Treyz of Veda Partners says.
- Bond investors may have been ahead of the market in pricing in the associated deficit increase, she tells Axios.
Yes, but: While billionaire investors like Ray Dalio are sounding the alarm on the U.S. "debt bomb," other investment advisors tell Axios there is still a case for owning treasuries.
- Dave Mazza, CEO of Roundhill Investments, says he is "not ready to throw in the towel" on U.S. debt.
The big picture: Historically, there's an argument that there is no alternative to the U.S. dollar or U.S. treasuries due to their safety (often shorthanded as "TINA" on Wall Street). But can the TINA trade last?
- BlackRock rebuffs questions about the long-term appeal of U.S. debt in its midyear outlook, saying "we don't think those concerns are justified."
The intrigue: Foreign investors hold about a quarter of America's debt, according to data from the BlackRock midyear outlook.
- If those investors get worried about the U.S. paying back that debt, they could take their money elsewhere, which could be devastating.
- Treasury data from April indicates a $12 billion decrease in foreign resident holdings of U.S. treasury bills, versus a $98 billion increase the month prior, though foreign ownership remains substantial.
The bottom line: "Treasuries will come back," says John Pantekidis, managing partner and CIO at Twin Focus, a $10 billion multifamily office, who adds that countries like China "have to buy Treasuries."
Thanks to Ben Berkowitz for editing and Anjelica Tan for copy editing. Enjoy the holiday and see you next week!
Sign up for Axios Markets




