Senate Democrats are drawing a preemptive red line on ICE reforms, telling us any sanctuary city crackdown is dead on arrival.

• "It's a nonstarter. The whole term is really misleading," Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said, adding that changes to state and local rules would "grant ICE even greater authority over local law enforcement."

Why it matters: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's rank-and-file are in no mood to let Republicans turn a debate about ICE's use of force into a conversation over the issue long championed by President Trump.

• "I know they're trying to change the conversation, but the issue is ICE's conduct," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told us. "That's the issue before us, and we should not let them change the subject."
• "There aren't sanctuary cities in statute," Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) said. "There are places where people have different levels of cooperation, and that's up to those localities — but there isn't a national sanctuary-city policy."

The other side: "These magnets of illegal immigration have to go," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said this week.

• "There is no upside to sanctuary cities unless you are a complete radical nutjob."

What we're hearing: Negotiations over a narrower set of ICE reforms could make it easier to prevent the Department of Homeland Security from shutting down Friday night.

• "There are certain red lines both sides won't negotiate on, but there are some things they will negotiate on — and that's where I think the potential deal space is," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters.

What's next: Thune moved this evening to set up a Thursday vote on the House-passed DHS bill. He can always swap in a short-term spending stopgap, if Democrats agree.

• Schumer signaled today he's willing to give negotiations some room to breathe — but he also wants to keep the pressure on the White House.
• "There's no reason we can't get this done by Thursday," Schumer told reporters. He did not rule out supporting a short-term spending bill.
• Thune hasn't ruled out scheduling votes on Friday, which would complicate some senators' plans to attend the Munich Security Conference.

Share this story

— Stephen Neukam and Hans Nichols

House Democrats are facing increasingly frustrated demands from their left flank not to give the Trump administration another inch on ICE funding.

• "Shut it down, shut it down, shut it down," Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) told us, "and maybe, maybe, they'll take us serious and understand that we are unwilling to negotiate some minimal crap."

Zoom in: More than half a dozen progressive Democratic House candidates expressed frustration to us that House and Senate Democrats have repeatedly given Republicans the necessary votes to keep the government funded.

• Analilia Mejia, the presumptive Democratic nominee in New Jersey's 11th Congressional District special election, told us: "I think Democrats have leverage, and I urge us to use it to the fullest extent."
• "It's absolutely pathetic how much leverage we forfeit as a party," said Kat Abughazaleh, a candidate in Illinois' 9th District. "House Democrats gave up their leverage and with it a critical chance to protect people from DHS and ICE abuse."

Between the lines: For many of these candidates, Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries didn't go far enough with their 10 proposed reforms to ICE.

• Nida Allam, running in North Carolina's 4th District, told us: "More half-solutions and empty promises from the establishment. ... When I'm in Washington, I'll accept nothing less than abolishing ICE completely."
• Similarly, Nate Blouin, a candidate in Utah's 1st District, said: "I don't think we can let this continue any longer. ... Longer term abolish ICE, shorter term I don't think we can continue any funding opportunities for that department."

Share this story

— Andrew Solender

A group of Republicans is set to stage a rebellion on the House floor tonight over leadership's move to block members from challenging Trump's tariffs.

Why it matters: It's a direct confrontation involving House Speaker Mike Johnson, his conference and the White House.

• GOP leadership still doesn't have the votes after delaying a 1:30pm vote to 8:30pm. It's been whipping votes all day, with help from White House officials.
• Reps. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) and Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) have said they plan to vote against the rule in protest of the blockade on tariff disapproval resolutions.

Zoom in: Johnson, at the request of the White House, moved yesterday to include language in the rules package to bar tariff disapproval resolutions until July 31.

• House Democrats are prepared to tee up resolutions challenging Trump's tariffs on Canada tomorrow.
• Those Democratic-led resolutions would likely garner enough GOP support to pass, and would be viewed as a rebuke of Trump's economic agenda.
• Some House Republicans are becoming increasingly uneasy about defending Trump's tariffs — and continuing to cede their constitutional authority over trade.

The bottom line: "This isn't the purpose of a rule," Kiley told us today. "It's meant to bring a bill to the floor [and] set the parameters for debate. It's not meant to smuggle in unrelated provisions that expand the power of leadership at the expense of our members."

— Kate Santaliz