Trump could take the lid off the world's largest nuclear stockpiles
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Rebecca Zisser / Axios
There are three truly existential threats to humanity: pandemics, climate change and nuclear weapons.
Why it matters: COVID-19 has rightfully absorbed the world's attention and will for months to come. But the last treaty constraining the world’s largest nuclear arsenals is set to expire in nine months.
Where things stand: The Trump administration has expressed little urgency over the looming expiration of New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty), which comes two weeks after the next presidential inauguration on Feb. 5.
- The treaty limits the long-range nuclear weapons programs of the U.S. and Russia, and it's verified through regular inspections.
- It was signed in 2010 to replace the 1991 START and could be extended for up to five years by mutual assent (congressional approval is not necessary).
- Russia had previously called for renegotiation, but it's now urging for an extension without preconditions.
- The U.S. wants to negotiate a new deal instead, but time is running out.
The Trump administration has three primary concerns about extending New START, according to Frank Klotz, the former U.S. Department of Energy undersecretary for nuclear security (2014–2018).
- It doesn’t cover tactical nuclear weapons. Russia has more short-range, lower-yield weapons and more ways to deliver them.
- It doesn’t cover the new nuclear delivery systems Russia is currently developing.
- It doesn’t constrain China, which is significantly expanding its nuclear capabilities.
The third point looms largest for the Trump administration.
- The administration is concerned that extending New START would undermine its hopes of a trilateral deal involving China, Foreign Policy reports, citing a State Department document.
- Marshall Billingslea, Trump's newly appointed special envoy for arms control, has been tasked with striking a new deal that restricts both of America's "great power" competitors.
Between the lines: China has no intention and little incentive to join such a deal, Rose Gottemoeller, the lead U.S. negotiator on New START, said Wednesday at an event hosted by the Arms Control Association.
- By the numbers: The U.S. and Russia together have an estimated 91% of the world’s nuclear warheads, and both countries have 20 times as many as China.
- Gottemoeller agrees that China should be brought into the arms control framework and that there are thorny issues to be discussed around tactical nuclear weapons and missile defense systems (a top Russian concern).
- But she contends that they can’t possibly be negotiated before February — particularly amid a pandemic and U.S. general election.
On the one hand: Some China hawks see little reason to agree to an arms control deal that does not involve America’s biggest geopolitical adversary.
On the other: Adm. Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs, says New START provides “continuous stability in an increasingly uncertain world."
- The worst-case scenario, Mullen says, is an "arms race that none of us can afford.”
