Apr 23, 2019

Trump gambles on tightening Iran oil sanctions as 2020 looms

Ben Geman, author of Generate

Passenger boat with Iranian flag overlooks oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz. Photo: Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The White House is trying to thread a needle: Tighten oil sanctions against Iran without raising energy prices enough to erode the president's political standing.

Driving the news: ICYMI, the administration isn't renewing sanctions waivers beyond early May for countries that still buy Iranian oil.

The big picture: "It's a gamble on the part of the administration," oil analyst Ellen Wald tells Axios.

  • "The administration is hoping that either other producers will make up for it, or at least gas prices will fall again before it becomes a political liability," she says.

The intrigue: It might very well work, and the roughly $2 jump in oil prices since the news broke Sunday night — Brent crude is trading around $74.16 this morning — may signal surprise as much as anything else.

  • Analysts see a more volatile oil market, with a smaller cushion to absorb geopolitical conflict other factors that can hinder offsetting supplies. Risks include Iranian actions in the Strait of Hormuz and conflict in Libya.

What's next: Analysts say there's enough crude sloshing around to prevent markets from going bananas, but do see a greater chance prices will skew higher.

  • Goldman analysts, in a note, are sticking to their forecast of Brent trading in the $70–$75 range this quarter, but add there's likely to be a delay in what they see as a decline to the $65 range later this year.
  • Barclays analysts now see "material upside risk" to their forecast that Brent will average $70 this year, noting that the decision will indeed tighten markets, but the action "does not affect our view on longer-term prices materially."
  • Eurasia Group, via a note, predicts near-term volatility, but not a big or sustained price spike, pointing to the market's spare capacity levels and the likelihood that China and India will continue some Iranian imports.

Threat level: The administration is expressing confidence that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, among others, will boost output to offset Iranian barrels. But there's some peril there.

  • "I think they may find that there's a difference between what the administration heard from Saudi Arabia and what Saudi Arabia believes it actually committed to doing," Wald notes.
  • Plus, Saudi barrels are not a panacea.
  • "The big gamble both the president and his Gulf allies are taking is that high geopolitical disruption risks amidst low spare production capacity could cause oil prices to rise sharply despite offsetting supply increases," Rapidan Energy Group's Bob McNally tells me.

The bottom line: There's still lots of time before the heart of election season.

  • "There may be pain for U.S. consumers, but it will only be for the short term and it’ll be over well before the 2020 elections," Eurasia Group's Henry Rome tells Axios.
  • "There will be quite a bit of volatility in the near term, but this will come out in the wash over the next year and a half," he adds.

Go deeper

Trump says he will campaign against Lisa Murkowski after her support for Mattis

Trump with Barr and Meadows outside St. John's Episcopal church in Washington, D.C. on June 1. Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump tweeted on Thursday that he would endorse "any candidate" with a pulse who runs against Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).

Driving the news: Murkowski said on Thursday that she supported former defense secretary James Mattis' condemnation of Trump over his response to protests in the wake of George Floyd's killing. She described Mattis' statement as "true, honest, necessary and overdue," Politico's Andrew Desiderio reports.

7 hours ago - World

The president vs. the Pentagon

Trump visits Mattis and the Pentagon in 2018. Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty

Over the course of just a few hours, President Trump was rebuffed by the Secretary of Defense over his call for troops in the streets and accused by James Mattis, his former Pentagon chief, of trampling the Constitution for political gain.

Why it matters: Current and former leaders of the U.S. military are drawing a line over Trump's demand for a militarized response to the protests and unrest that have swept the country over the killing of George Floyd by police.

New York Times says Tom Cotton op-ed did not meet standards

Photo: Avalon/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

A New York Times spokesperson said in a statement Thursday that the paper will be changing its editorial board processes after a Wednesday op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), which called for President Trump to "send in the troops" in order to quell violent protests, failed to meet its standards.

Why it matters: The shift comes after Times employees began a coordinated movement on social media on Wednesday and Thursday that argued that publishing the op-ed put black staff in danger. Cotton wrote that Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act in order to deploy the U.S. military against rioters that have overwhelmed police forces in cities across the country.