SaveSave story

Household products are a significant source of city air pollution

LA skyline enveloped in smog shortly before sunset on November 17, 2006.
The Los Angeles skyline enveloped in smog shortly before sunset on Nov. 17, 2006. Photo: David McNew / Getty Images

Common household products like cosmetics, paints, deodorants and cleaners may be a significant source of unhealthy pollutants in U.S. cities. According to a new study published today in the journal Science, chemicals released from these products create as much pollution in the form of ozone and particulate matter as burning fossil fuels.

The bottom line: Overall, air quality in the U.S. has improved due to strict regulations on emissions from cars. And, at the same time, the amount and proportion of other pollutants from consumer products has increased. Addressing that remaining source could further improve human health, according to some experts.

"The main message is that the important sources of air pollution in urban areas are changing. Historically, it was dominated by motor vehicles and over time there has been major success in controlling that source. As a result, other sources are more prominent now as a fraction of the overall problem."
— Robert Harley, University of California, Berkeley

What's new: Air pollution measurements have long focused on gasoline-related hydrocarbons. It can be difficult to measure chemical compounds in coatings, paints and other products because they are volatile by nature, and can convert into hundreds of different intermediate species before eventually creating carbon dioxide and water. But "measurement capabilities have advanced, not in just detecting ultra-low concentrations but also non-traditional compounds," says Harley, an author on the study.

What they did: A multi-year, multi-institute study identified the chemical fingerprints left behind by various consumer products, then looked for their presence in both indoor and outdoor air in Los Angeles.

What they found: Despite automobile use increasing, particulates from gas were much lower than previous estimates, likely due to strict emissions controls. Compounds like ethanol and acetone, however, were present in much higher amounts than predicted.

  • The authors believe the likely source is household and consumer products like scented hygiene products and cleaners.
  • Most of the volatile particles from those products get washed down the drain, but the authors estimate roughly 40% end up in the air.
  • Even though these consumer goods make up only 5% of petroleum products, they're responsible for up to half of the volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from fossil fuels. That's because "many of the volatile chemical products we use each day are intended to evaporate," said one of the study authors Jessica Gilman, a research scientist at NOAA, in a press conference. Think of waiting for nailpolish or glue to dry, she said.

Yes, but: "Every city is different," says Caltech's Paul Wennberg, who wasn't involved in the research. Trees also emit volatile organic compounds and in the wooded Southeast may be bigger contributors than these compounds from consumer products. And in Houston, for example, the petrochemical industry is an outsized source compared to other cities. The study underscores the need for local measurements, says Wennberg.

The health impact: Emissions — whether from gasoline or chemical products — contribute to the amount of fine particulate matter in the air, which has been linked to health issues and premature death and is capped by the Environmental Protection Agency. “Health data suggest we could still get benefit by going lower and if we are going to go lower, we need to address these sources," says Allen Robinson, a professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon University who wasn't involved in the study. “Air quality is degrading people’s health and if we’re going to improve air quality, it’s not cars anymore, there are other sources.”

And, unlike car emissions, people encounter these chemicals inside. "A lot of the products that are now the major source of air pollution are products we use inside our homes and as result we can be highly exposed to the organic chemicals in the air we breathe inside our homes," says Harley.

The big picture: The authors caution that more research needs to be done before any regulations can be passed because it's still not clear what specific products are the largest polluters, or if any one pollutant stands out. In the past, regulations successfully limited the amount of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, allowed in household products.

For now, said Gillman, this research is a reminder that "the choices we make every day in our daily lives are changing the composition of the atmosphere," and the very air we breathe.

SaveSave story

Airlines may not be the "germ incubator" you thought

Inside of an airplane
Photo: via Getty Images

The chance of becoming infected with a common respiratory virus on an airplane may be smaller than originally thought — less than 3% unless you are sitting within one meter of an infected person, where your chances rise to 80%, according to a study published in PNAS Monday.

Why it matters: There are more than 3 billion airline passengers annually, and global health officials want to learn more how infectious diseases are transmitted, particularly after reported transmission of cases of flu pandemic and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) via planes.

SaveSave story

Early humans innovated tools earlier than thought

Archaeologist Rick Potts squats in the Olorgesailie Basin in Kenya with various surprisingly sophisticated tools found from 320,000 years ago.
Richard Potts surveys assortment of Early Stone Age handaxes discovered in the Olorgesailie Basin, Kenya. Photo: Human Origins Program, Smithsonian

Unpredictable climate and natural disasters like earthquakes may have spurred early humans to create innovative tools and ways to communicate earlier than previously thought, according to 3 studies published Thursday in Science.

What they found: Evidence that around 320,000 years ago — near the start of the Middle Stone Age (MSA) and tens of thousands of years earlier than previous evidence has shown — early humans in East Africa may have created projectile hunting tools, developed ways to communicate using colors for mapping or identification purposes, and traveled longer distances to trade, hunt or obtain valuable materials.

"It's not just humans changing but really the entire ecosystem. It's a picture that's bigger than just the human ancestors themselves."
— Smithsonian's Richard Potts, who spearheaded the studies