A doctor operating on a patient's knee. Photo: Sven Hoppe/picture alliance via Getty Images

We spend a lot of time talking about how hard it is for patients to find out how much any particular health care service is going to cost them.

A bigger problem: The Wall Street Journal uses the example of knee replacements to illustrate that difficulty, but also raises a bigger, even more frustrating point: It’s hard for hospitals to figure out how much their own work costs.

The details: Gundersen Health System in Wisconsin “had no real idea what it cost to perform the surgery” and wanted to find out why it was charging a list price north of $50,000, WSJ reports.

  • That process entailed “an 18-month review” in which “an efficiency expert trailed doctors and nurses to record every minute of activity.”
  • They ultimately determined that the procedure cost $10,550 — a fifth of the price the hospital had set.
  • The review uncovered other quality and efficiency issues. Some days, there weren’t enough beds for patients after surgery, and doctors performed the procedure differently “for reasons that weren’t always clear.”
  • “Gundersen’s analysis found that the hospital had been exclusively using brand-name cement, premixed with antibiotics. The hospital slashed its cement costs by 57% by switching to a generic,” per WSJ. “It isn’t clear how the orthopedics department came to use the brand-name cement … [one doctor] said he was perplexed when the analysis uncovered it.”

My thought bubble: Good on Gundersen for trying to figure all this out, but Gundersen isn’t an isolated example. This is the system we have.

  • And even though most of us don’t pay the full sticker price for health care, our premiums and out-of-pocket costs all still flow from that top-line number — which, WSJ notes, is set “using a combination of educated guesswork and a canny assessment of market opportunity.”

Go deeper

Bryan Walsh, author of Future
31 mins ago - Health

Rockefeller Foundation commits $1 billion for COVID-19 recovery

A health worker performs a COVID-19 test in New Delhi. Photo: Raj K Raj/Hindustan Times via Getty Images

The Rockefeller Foundation announced on Monday that it will allocate $1 billion over the next three years to address the pandemic and its aftermath.

Why it matters: The mishandled pandemic and the effects of climate change threaten to reverse global progress and push more than 100 million people into poverty around the world. Governments and big NGOs need to ensure that the COVID-19 recovery reaches everyone who needs it.

Updated 52 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Politics: Ex-FDA chief: Pence campaigning after COVID exposure puts others at risk — Mark Meadows: "We are not going to control the pandemic"
  2. Health: 13 states set single-day coronavirus case records last week — U.S. reports over 80,000 new cases for second consecutive day.
  3. World: Italy tightens restrictions Spain declares new state of emergency.
  4. Media: Fox News president and several hosts advised to quarantine after possible COVID-19 exposure

Fox News president and several hosts advised to quarantine in COVID-19 precaution

A political display is posted on the outside of the Fox News headquarters on 6th Avenue in New York City in July. Photo: Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images

Fox News President Jay Wallace and anchors Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum are among those recommended to get tested and quarantine after possible exposure to COVID-19, the New York Times first reported Sunday night.

The big picture: The Fox News contingent, which also included "The Five" show hosts Juan Williams and Dana Perino, were on a charter flight from Nashville to New York following Thursday's presidential debate with a person who later tested positive for the coronavirus.