Dec 4, 2018

Growing Russian interference calls for coordinated response

Russian President Vladimir Putin. Photo: Alexei Druzhinin/TASS via Getty Images

On Dec. 1, Defense Secretary Mattis became the first Trump administration official to publicly confirm that the Kremlin continues to interfere in U.S. democracy, including in last month's midterm elections. Mattis has described Putin as a “slow learner,” but a new tracking project shows him to be an operator who has spent nearly two decades sharpening and deploying a set of asymmetric tools across the Atlantic.

The big picture: Election interference is just one part of Russia’s strategy. The Alliance for Securing Democracy has catalogued Kremlin fingerprints on over 400 incidents of interference in 42 countries. Beyond bots and troll farms, the toolbox includes information operations, cyberattacks, political subversion, strategic economic coercion and malign finance.

Russia's interference in Macedonia’s NATO accession efforts may seem unrelated to its malign finance campaign in Moldova, but deeper analysis shows these activities are part of a coordinated Kremlin effort to undermine democratic institutions throughout Europe and across the Atlantic. Rather than falling off after President Trump’s election in 2016, such efforts have continued apace, in a slow-burn destabilization strategy.

What to watch:

  • Escalating intensity of interference: Kremlin activities surged after the 2013 Euromaidan protests in Ukraine, suggesting it has come to rely more on these asymmetric tools, which come at minimal cost and offer a vital veneer of deniability.
  • Expanding geographic scope: Interference efforts prior to November 2013 targeted fewer than 30 transatlantic countries, mainly those within Russia’s “near-abroad” in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and the Baltics. Since then, efforts have expanded to 42 transatlantic countries, with an increasing emphasis on Western Europe and North America.
  • Cyber and information operations: Since 2014, documented instances of cyberattacks and information operations (those making strategic, coordinated use of social or traditional media) have increased tenfold, indicating both the rising influence of the internet and the failure of democracies to deter action and secure vulnerabilities in cyberspace.

The bottom line: Moscow is playing a long game, and interference in specific elections is just one part of it. Getting ahead of the threat will therefore require Euro-Atlantic institutions to develop robust multilateral mechanisms to identify vulnerabilities and to coordinate rapid responses and effective deterrents.

Laura Rosenberger is director of the Alliance for Securing Democracy and a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

Go deeper

Snapchat will no longer promote Trump's account in Discover

Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Snapchat will no longer promote President Trump's account on its "Discover" page of curated content, a spokesperson tells Axios, after Trump tweeted comments that some suggested glorified violence amid racial justice protests.

Why it matters: Snapchat is taking action on the president's account for comments he made elsewhere. That's going farther than other big tech firms and signals a commitment to aligning content served to users with core values, rather than making moderation decisions based narrowly on each post made on its own platform.

Updated 1 hour ago - Politics & Policy

Esper catches White House off guard with opposition to military use, photo op

Defense Secretary Mark Esper said at a press briefing Wednesday that he does not support invoking the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that permits the president to use active-duty troops on U.S. soil, in order to quell protests against racial injustice.

Why it matters: President Trump threatened this week to deploy military forces if state and local governments aren't able to squash violent protests. Axios reported on Wednesday that Trump is backing off the idea for now, but that he hasn't ruled it out.

Chinese coronavirus test maker agreed to build a Xinjiang gene bank

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

A leading Chinese gene sequencing and biomedical firm that said it would build a gene bank in Xinjiang is supplying coronavirus tests around the world.

Why it matters: U.S. officials are worried that widespread coronavirus testing may provide an opportunity for state-connected companies to compile massive DNA databases for research as well as genetics-based surveillance.