Updated Jan 25, 2018

Gerrymandering's moment of reckoning

Illustration: Rebecca Zisser / Axios

Gerrymandering is at a tipping point. The courts are taking a harder line than ever before, saying some states have simply gone too far as they tried to give one political party an advantage. But if the Supreme Court doesn’t join the mounting legal backlash — and soon — there may be no limits on state parties’ ability to design their own political battlegrounds.

Why it matters: The outcome of these legal battles not only has the potential to upend the 2018 midterms, but also the more fundamental tools of politics and governance. If you’re trying to preserve a majority, gerrymandering works. The question is whether it works too well.

Where it stands: The dam has broken on partisan gerrymandering. After giving the states free rein for decades, federal courts recently struck down legislative maps in Wisconsin and North Carolina, drawing a constitutional line that had previously existed only in theory.

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court also ruled last week that the state’s Republican-led redistricting plan violated the state constitution.

  • “This is a very different moment, in the sense that you now have a number of federal courts striking these plans down,” said Richard Pildes, an NYU law professor who specializes in issues that affect the democratic process.
  • The momentum in lower courts has pushed the issue of partisan gerrymandering back to the Supreme Court. It heard oral arguments last year over Wisconsin’s gerrymandering and will hear a case this spring over one set of district lines in Maryland. A ruling against North Carolina’s partisan redistricting plan is also in the pipeline toward the high court.

What they’re saying: The legislatures that came up with these controversial district lines say this is all just part of the political process. That’s always been the Supreme Court’s position, too, at least in practice — and some of the court’s conservative justices seem inclined to keep it that way.

  • “You're taking these issues away from democracy and you're throwing them into the courts pursuant to … sociological gobbledygook,” Chief Justice John Roberts said during arguments in Wisconsin’s case.

The other side: Critics say Wisconsin and North Carolina are examples of just how aggressive and sophisticated gerrymandering has gotten. And they say waiting for a political solution is a Catch-22 — you can change the redistricting process by winning elections, but the redistricting process makes it almost impossible for you to win elections.

  • In Wisconsin, for example, Democrats won more than 50% of the vote in 2012, yet Republicans ended up with 60% of the state’s legislative seats.

How it could work: Academics have proposed a couple of tests the courts could apply to decide when a partisan gerrymander becomes unconstitutional.

  • One possibility would be to look for “partisan symmetry” — the idea being that if, for example, Republicans winning 55% of the vote gives them 70% of the seats in the state legislature, that’s OK as long as Democrats would also control 70% of the seats if they won 55% of the vote.
  • But that’s the “sociological gobbledygook” Roberts was worried about.

Why now: Republicans may be victims of their own success here. They dominated a majority of state governments after the 2010 census, when district lines had to be redrawn, and they maximized that advantage.

  • Roberts has said he’s worried that if the court starts striking down some states’ maps, it’ll have to litigate every redistricting plan in the country, and will be perceived as partisan.
  • The case from Maryland involves a Democratic-led gerrymander, and therefore might offer the court a way to tackle this issue without appearing to single out Republicans.

The impact: Even a limited ruling against Wisconsin, Maryland or (eventually) North Carolina would cross a new and unprecedented threshold.

On the other hand, the court’s past allowances that political gerrymandering could theoretically be unconstitutional may not matter if it can never identify an actual map that crosses the line.

The bottom line: This is a dispute the courts have tried to stay out of for years. “I think there might have been at some level some hope that other institutional solutions would emerge,” Pildes said. But it’ll be hard to stay neutral much longer.

Go deeper

Amid racial unrest, a test at the polls

Photo: Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Eight states plus D.C. are holding primary elections today following a week of intense protests across the country over the brutal police killing of George Floyd.

Why it matters: It's the first major test for voting since the national outcry. Concerns over civil unrest and the police — as well as the coronavirus and expanded absentee voting — could reduce the number of voters showing up in person but heighten tensions for those who do.

Axios-Ipsos poll: America’s big racial divide on police, virus

Data: Ipsos/Axios survey; Note: ±3.2% margin of error; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

A new Axios-Ipsos poll finds that America has a massive racial gulf on each of our twin calamities — trust in police, and fear of the coronavirus.

  • 77% of whites say they trust local police, compared with just 36% of African Americans — one of many measures of a throbbing racial divide in Week 11 of the Axios-Ipsos Coronavirus Index, taken the week George Floyd was killed by a white policeman in Minneapolis.
Updated 42 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Updates: George Floyd protests nationwide

Police officers wearing riot gear push back demonstrators outside of the White House on Monday. Photo: Jose Luis Magana/AFP via Getty Images

Protests over the death of George Floyd and other police-related killings of black people continued for a seventh day across the U.S., with President Trump threatening on Monday to deploy the military if the unrest continues.

The latest: Four police officers were struck by gunfire while standing near a line in St Louis on Monday after a peaceful demonstration, Police Chief John Hayden said early Tuesday. They were all taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries. He said a small group of people had thrown rocks and fireworks at police officers.