A Pakistan Army soldier stands guard along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border fence near the Punjpai area of Quetta on May 8, 2018. Photo: Banarasa Khan/AFP via Getty Images

Earlier this year, the Trump administration suspended most security assistance, including Coalition Support Funds (CSF), to Pakistan and led the charge to place the country on an international terrorism-financing watchlist, beginning next month.

Why it matters: The ineffectiveness of U.S. sanctions after Pakistan’s 1998 nuclear tests — coupled with China’s emergence as Pakistan’s financial benefactor — suggests coercive measures are unlikely to compel Pakistan's army to cease backing militant networks that target U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

Background: After Pakistan detonated, by its account, six nuclear devices 20 years ago, the U.S. levied sanctions on Pakistan (and India, which also tested in 1998). Sanctions included the suspension of U.S. economic and military assistance and restrictions on access to loans from international financial institutions. In Pakistan, the sudden credit scarcity caused a balance-of-payments crisis and stifled GDP growth. But Pakistan still deployed ballistic missiles, and today possesses one of the world's fastest-growing nuclear arsenals.

Both the U.S. deferral of CSF military aid and Pakistan’s inclusion on the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) terrorism-financing watchlist could create a cascade of economic challenges reminiscent of those in 1998. Today, though, Pakistan has an all-weather friend in China, which appears poised to help Pakistan stave off a financial crisis by offering loans at reasonable rates.

Yes, but: Pakistan may not be able to count on China indefinitely. Beijing has a history of leveraging unpaid debt into strategic gains that disadvantage loan recipients, and it proved unwilling to shield Pakistan from the FATF designation.

The bottom line: U.S. economic coercion did not work in 1998, and it’s unlikely to stop the Pakistan Army from supporting cross-border militancy in Afghanistan now. As the U.S. loses leverage with Pakistan, any adjustments in Pakistan’s security policies are likely to come from Eastern pressure rather than Western.

Travis Wheeler is a Research Associate with the Stimson Center’s South Asia Program.

Go deeper

Updated 3 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 4:30 p.m. ET: 21,020,216 — Total deaths: 761,393— Total recoveries: 13,048,303Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 4:30 p.m. ET: 5,289,323 — Total deaths: 167,948 — Total recoveries: 1,774,648 — Total tests: 64,831,306Map.
  3. Health: CDC: Survivors of COVID-19 have up to three months of immunity Fauci believes normalcy will return by "the end of 2021" with vaccine — The pandemic's toll on mental health.
  4. Business: How small businesses got stiffed — Unemployment starts moving in the right direction.
  5. Cities: Coronavirus pandemic dims NYC's annual 9/11 Tribute in Light.
  6. Politics: Biden signals fall strategy with new ads.

Harris: "Women are going to be a priority" in Biden administration

Sen. Kamala Harris at an event in Wilmington, Del. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

In her first sit-down interview since being named Joe Biden's running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris talked about what she'll do to fight for women if elected VP, and how the Democrats are thinking about voter turnout strategies ahead of November.

What they're saying: "In a Biden-Harris administration women are going to be a priority, understanding that women have many priorities and all of them must be acknowledged," Harris told The 19th*'s Errin Haines-Whack.

Facebook goes after Apple

Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios

Facebook is seeking to force a face-off with Apple over its 30% in-app purchase commission fee, which Facebook suggests hurts small businesses struggling to get by during the pandemic.

The big picture: Facebook has never publicly gone after Apple, a key strategic partner, this aggressively. Both companies face antitrust scrutiny, which in Apple's case has centered on the very fee structure Facebook is now attacking.