Inside the White House with D.C.'s most wired reporter. Sign up for Mike Allen's Axios AM.

Stories

Democrats are divided on how to tackle the ACA lawsuit

In this image, Democratic leaders stand on stage in the background of a blurred camera shot. They are standing underneath a presentation screen.
Nancy Pelosi speaks at a conference about the White House's targeting of the ACA's pre-existing conditions. Photo: Toya Sarno Jordan/Getty Images

Congress could easily get rid of the GOP lawsuit that threatens the entire Affordable Care Act — if Democrats want to force the issue. But two of the smartest pro-ACA legal experts are divided over whether that’s a good strategy.

Refresher: The lawsuit, filed by Republican attorneys general, argues that the ACA’s individual mandate is invalid because Congress has zeroed out the penalty for not having insurance — and the penalty, not the mandate it was enforcing, is what the Supreme Court upheld in 2012. A great many legal experts consider the GOP's argument a long shot, but it won the first round of legal proceedings.

There's an easy fix: Just repeal the mandate. It's not in effect, and realistically, Democrats are unlikely to ever raise the penalty back above $0.

What they're saying:

  • Go for it, says University of Michigan law professor Nick Bagley. At best, Democrats would neutralize a lawsuit that could undo the ACA. At worst, they'd be putting Republicans on the record about the future of protections for people with pre-existing conditions.
  • Not so fast, argues Washington & Lee's Tim Jost. He's afraid that if Democrats attempted such a fix but failed, conservative judges could take it as a tacit admission that there’s a problem, and use that as a pretext to strike down the ACA.

Go deeper: Andrew Sprung, one of the Internet's best ACA resources, spoke to both Bagley and Jost and has a good roundup about all this on his blog.

More stories loading.