Jul 26, 2018

California court rules Starbucks must pay workers for off-the-clock tasks

A Starbucks coffee shop in San Francisco, California. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The California state Supreme Court ordered Starbucks Thursday to pay its employees who routinely perform tasks after their scheduled shift, such as store closings.

The backdrop: This comes after Douglas Troester, a Starbucks employee, filed a complaint in court arguing that he should get paid for his time spent closing up the shop, activating the alarm and walking coworkers to their cars — in compliance with the company’s policy.

Court documents reveal that, over the 17-month period of his employment, Troester’s unpaid time totaled to about 12 hours and 50 minutes. At $8 per hour (minimum wage at the time), that adds up to $102.67.

  • “That is enough to pay a utility bill, buy a week of groceries, or cover a month of bus fares,” Associate Justice Goodwin Liu wrote.
  • A U.S. District Court had ruled against Troester, saying that the time spent carrying out the tasks was minimal. But Liu wrote that "the facts here demonstrate, a few extra minutes of work each day can add up."
  • But Associate Justice Leondra Kruger said there may be times that are “so brief ... or difficult to accurately measure or estimate,” which might be unreasonable for an employer to account for. The case has returned to the 9th Circuit for a final decision.

A Starbucks spokesperson told Axios: "We are disappointed with the court’s decision. We will await further disposition of the case before the 9th circuit as the appeal process continues."

Go deeper

Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

George Floyd protests: Unrest continues for 6th night across U.S.

A protest near the White House on Sunday night. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Most external lights at the White House were turned off late Sunday as the D.C. National Guard was deployed and authorities fired tear gas at hundreds of protesters nearby, per the New York Times.

What's happening: It's one of several tense, late-night standoffs between law enforcement and demonstrators in the United States.

Updated 6 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Journalists get caught in the crosshairs as protests unfold

A man waves a Black Lives Matter flag atop the CNN logo outside the CNN Center during a protest in response to the police killing of George Floyd, Atlanta, Georgia, May 29. Photo: Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images

Dozens of journalists across the country tweeted videos Saturday night of themselves and their crews getting arrested, being shot at by police with rubber bullets, targeted with tear gas by authorities or assaulted by protesters.

Driving the news: The violence got so bad over the weekend that on Sunday the Cleveland police said the media was not allowed downtown unless "they are inside their place of business" — drawing ire from news outlets around the country, who argued that such access is a critical part of adequately covering protests.

Inside Trump's antifa tweet

President Trump at Cape Canaveral on May 30. Photo: Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

As recently as Saturday night, senior administration officials told me that the designation of a violent cohort of far-left activists, antifa, as a terrorist organization was not being seriously discussed at the White House. But that was Saturday.

Behind the scenes: The situation changed dramatically a few hours later, after prominent conservative allies of the president, such as his friend media commentator Dan Bongino, publicly urged a tough response against people associated with antifa (short for "anti-fascist").