Sens. Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray reached a health care deal Tuesday. Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP

Senate Republicans and Democrats both agree President Trump's decision to end the Affordable Care Act cost-sharing reduction subsidies gave a heightened sense of urgency to bipartisan negotiations to stabilize the individual market, resulting in the deal announced yesterday. But each side says the president's decision left them better off, and that they ended up with the better deal.

Be smart: The deal Sens. Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray reached includes policies many experts from across the ideological spectrum say will effectively help stabilize the marketplaces. If both sides can claim victory and thus successfully pass the bill, then millions of people could be better off.

"I think both sides are motivated to get something that keeps the market stable," Sen. John Thune told me. "The one thing that the president deciding to do that, did, is forced them to come to the table."

Alexander and Murray began their bipartisan negotiations after the GOP repeal and replace effort fell apart over the summer. But until Tuesday — less than a week after Trump made his decision on the CSR payments — the two sides had been unable to reach an agreement.

  • State waiver flexibility was a key sticking point. Republicans wanted the waiver flexibility to be meaningful, while Democrats were concerned about changing consumer protection "guardrails" currently in place.
  • Democrats had also been pushing for ACA enrollment funding after the administration slashed it, as well as funding to help states start reinsurance programs.
  • Without these other issues settled — especially the waivers, which were key to GOP support — it didn't matter that both sides generally agreed on funding the CSR payments for two years.

How it's playing:

  • "When the president precipitously pulled out cost-sharing, many of our Republican colleagues said, 'Oh no, we don't want the consequences of this on our doorstep.' And it pushed them, I think, closer to a deal with us," Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters. "Frankly, after the president did what he did, the negotiations got better for us." A Democratic leadership aide said Republicans agreed to include $106 million in enrollment outreach funding only after Trump's CSR announcement.A senior GOP aide countered that while a specific number hadn't been agreed to, there had already been an agreement in principle to include funding.
  • By ending the CSR payments and issuing a health care executive order last week, Trump "showed Dems that they needed to cut a deal with Lamar," the senior GOP aide said. "Dems finally gave meaningful flexibility only after CSR payments ended."
  • Alexander said while he's not sure what impact the decision to end CSR payments had, "what made a difference was his calls to me and his public statements" in support of the deal.

Yes, but: Not everyone is singing the deal's praises. Some conservatives aren't happy with it at all, which is consistent with their dislike of what they consider "insurer bailouts." "Alexander got zilch," said a conservative Senate aide.

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica}

Go deeper

Updated 8 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 6:15 p.m. ET: 30,611,684 — Total deaths: 953,820— Total recoveries: 20,836,867Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 6:15 p.m. ET: 6,756,781 — Total deaths: 199,090 — Total recoveries: 2,556,465 — Total tests: 93,150,052Map.
  3. Politics: In reversal, CDC again recommends coronavirus testing for asymptomatic people.
  4. Health: The dwindling chances of eliminating COVID-19.
  5. World: Guatemalan president tests positive for COVID-19 — The countries painting their pandemic recoveries green.

Trump says he expects to announce a Supreme Court nominee "next week"

President Trump speaking prior to his departure from the White House on Sept. 19. Photo: Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images

President Trump said Saturday he expects to announce a nominee for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's vacant Supreme Court seat “next week” and that the person will “most likely" be a woman.

What he's saying: "If somebody were to ask me now, I would say that a woman would be in first place, yes. The choice of a woman, I would say, would certainly be appropriate," the president told pool reporters.

Susan Collins says Senate should postpone Supreme Court vote

Sen. Susan Collins. Photo: Tom Williams/Getty Images

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said in a statement Saturday she believes whoever is elected in the 2020 presidential race should pick the nominee to fill Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Supreme Court seat.

Why it matters: Collins will be key in how the nomination process plays out. As one of the most centrist Senate Republicans, whether or not the Senate confirms Trump's SCOTUS nominee could hinge on her vote.