An artist's illustration of Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket in flight. Photo: Blue Origin

Blue Origin is protesting the Air Force's methods for finding 2 companies to launch national security payloads through the mid-2020s.

Why it matters: If chosen, the companies will effectively lock in billions of dollars in revenue, undertaking a 60/40 split of national security launches between 2022 and 2026.

The big picture: Blue Origin, SpaceX, Northrop Grumman and United Launch Alliance are all expected to compete to launch these payloads, and it would be a boon for their bottom lines.

  • "The demand for rockets really can't support all the providers. So it's a kind of vicious fight to stay alive," John Logsdon, founder of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University, told Axios of the competition earlier this year.

The state of play: In a fact sheet, Blue Origin claims that the Air Force's request for proposals is "flawed" and favors incumbents — SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — that have launched missions for the Air Force in recent years.

  • A redacted copy of the protest filed with the U.S. Government Accountability Office and obtained by Axios accuses the Air Force of using "ambiguous" selection criteria, making it difficult to write a competitive proposal.
  • The protest also claims that the way the request for proposals stands now will result in a "duopoly" that restricts competition.
  • A source with knowledge of the situation told Axios that the protest comes after conversations with the Air Force expressing these concerns.

Context: If chosen, Blue Origin would use its New Glenn rocket to launch these national security payloads. That rocket is expected to make its first flight in 2021, after the government agency has already chosen its launch providers.

Meanwhile, the Air Force awarded Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman and United Launch Alliance millions of dollars in 2018 to aid in the development of their new launch systems and meet stringent demands for national security-related launches.

Go deeper: Space companies fight for cash with rockets on the line

Go deeper

Pelosi: "States don't have the money" for Trump's unemployment order

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told "Fox News Sunday" that states don't have the funds to comply with the executive order President Trump signed on Friday, which requires them to cover 25% of an additional $400 in weekly unemployment benefits.

Why it matters: Many state and local governments have had their budgets devastated by the economic impacts of the coronavirus, which have caused expenses to soar and revenues to plunge.

Kudlow says he regrets claiming Trump couldn't use executive order for unemployment

White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday that he regrets suggesting this week that unemployment benefits can only be extended by Congress.

Why it matters: President Trump's decision to bypass Congress to sign four executive actions, including one that provides $400 per week in extra unemployment benefits, has prompted outcry from Democrats and even some Republicans who believe he is overstepping his constitutional authority.

2 hours ago - World

Lebanon information minister resigns days after deadly explosion

Anti-government protesters in Beirut. Photo: STR/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Lebanon’s information minister resigned on Sunday in the wake of mass protests over the deadly blast in Beirut's port last week, which has killed at least 160 people and injured nearly 6,000, AP reports.

Why it matters: In her resignation letter, Manal Abdel-Samad called change "elusive" and apologized for not delivering more to the country, which had been devastated by a financial crisis and the coronavirus pandemic even before the blast destroyed much of the capital city.