Sign up for our daily briefing

Make your busy days simpler with Axios AM/PM. Catch up on what's new and why it matters in just 5 minutes.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on the day's biggest business stories

Subscribe to Axios Closer for insights into the day’s business news and trends and why they matter

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Stay on top of the latest market trends

Subscribe to Axios Markets for the latest market trends and economic insights. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Sports news worthy of your time

Binge on the stats and stories that drive the sports world with Axios Sports. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Tech news worthy of your time

Get our smart take on technology from the Valley and D.C. with Axios Login. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Get the inside stories

Get an insider's guide to the new White House with Axios Sneak Peek. Sign up for free.

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Denver news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Denver

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Des Moines news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Des Moines

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Twin Cities news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Twin Cities

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Tampa Bay news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Tampa Bay

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Want a daily digest of the top Charlotte news?

Get a daily digest of the most important stories affecting your hometown with Axios Charlotte

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Sign up for Axios NW Arkansas

Stay up-to-date on the most important and interesting stories affecting NW Arkansas, authored by local reporters

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Please enter a valid email.

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!

Photo: Adam Glanzman/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Two Biogen executives said in an interview the company's newly approved Alzheimer's drug is priced fairly, and that it didn't conduct another clinical trial before approval because the FDA didn't push them to do so.

Why it matters: The scientific consensus is the drug, Aduhelm, has not been proven to work. But Biogen and the FDA are content with "hopefully" validating the $56,000 drug's efficacy at some unknown point in the future.

This interview was with Maha Radhakrishnan, Biogen’s chief medical officer, and Chirfi Guindo, Biogen's head of global product strategy and pricing, and has been edited for brevity and clarity.

Axios: The FDA approved Aduhelm under the condition that Biogen run a confirmatory trial. When will the company start that?

Maha Radhakrishnan: We're in the process of discussions of what the study should look like. As things become more clear to us, we'll be sure to share that publicly.

A: The FDA said they were going to give up to nine years to submit trial data. Do you plan on taking that long?

MR: Our plan is to be able to finalize a study design, the patient population, the site, the countries, et cetera. What we do not have in our control ... we do have milestones on recruitment and enrollment. Whether it will pan out in the real world as we expect is the question, which is why we usually give ourselves time, but with the hope that we can can expedite and accelerate the study readout.

Q: Why didn't Biogen do this trial in 2019, when you were parsing through the data again?

MR: That's a good question. But I do want to go back a minute to the amount of information, the substantial volume of evidence that we submitted to the FDA as part of our filing package. We submitted data on eight clinical programs ... so based on the negotiations we've had with the regulators, we are about to embark on a path where we will actually look to validate and verify the data that we have seen in our clinical program.

Q: But going back to my question, why didn't Biogen conduct another trial before submitting an application to the FDA?

Chirfi Guindo: I think we were informed by our engagement with the regulator, and we were prepared to do what was necessary in order to get Aduhelm to the finish line. We're pleased to be in a situation now where we can provide access to these patients and their families, while we continue to generate data going forward.

A: But why not start the trial when you were looking at the data in 2019? One of the phase 3 trials failed outright, and then the other showed some signs of amyloid reduction. Didn't you feel you at the least needed a tiebreaker?

MR: When we decided to go back into discussions with the FDA, after really looking at the data, we were essentially respecting the guidance from the FDA in terms of what was needed to submit the [drug application]. All companies follow the pathway given by the regulators.

A: So, in 2019, did the FDA say you didn't have to run another trial just submit an application?

MR: Anytime a company gets into a regulatory dialogue, we usually listen to the advice and feedback that we get.

A: Why does Biogen believe Aduhelm's $56,000 list price is fair, especially considering this hasn't been proven to work? This could potentially balloon Medicare spending.

CG: We've consulted with experts, health economists, clinicians, as well as payers and policy leaders, because we take this responsibility very seriously. We were guided by the value that Aduhelm has and will have going forward. The second principle is the commitment that we have to continue to research and develop innovative medicines in, not only Alzheimer's but also other areas of neuroscience. These are all areas that are very risky. And then lastly, we are committed to working with the payers, working with public policymakers, to ensure that Aduhelm is affordable for patients. That is really what is most important to patients: affordability, and then the sustainability of the whole system.

A: But doing just a little math on how Medicare pays for these drugs results in tens of billions of dollars in added spending. So it's going to raise out-of-pocket costs significantly, but also Medicare premiums.

CG: We anticipate that there will be probably around 10% of Medicare patients who would be really exposed to a high copay. We have been talking with [the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] to see if there's something that can be done for those patients. On the total budget impact, we do not anticipate a very rapid uptake. This is not a treatment that is one pill, once a day that your average family physician can prescribe.

A: Even if you get only 200,000-300,000 Alzheimer's patients, we're talking upwards of $17 billion. That'd make it the drug Medicare spends most on by a long shot, no?

CG: I don't believe we will get into those tens of billions of dollars, at least not in the initial few years. But if you look at the bigger picture, the system collectively spends $600 billion a year on Alzheimer's care. Just imagine you have a treatment that over time can mitigate some of that cost.

A: But those analyses assume the drug works. How can you make those types of assumptions of saved costs if Aduhelm hasn't been proven yet?

MR: You keep saying it has not worked. The data from our studies actually talk to the evidence seen in the study, which is what we're looking to verify by the next study. And again, in the last 20-plus years ... there has been really no treatment, no hope for patients. What Aduhelm offers, hopefully, is a hope to really be able to integrate these patients back into society, give them back a quality of life.

Go deeper

Sep 14, 2021 - Health

What hospitals don't like about Democrats' drug pricing bill

Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios

Hospitals are worried that the Democrats' plans to curb prescription drug costs could be the beginning of a slippery slope that ultimately cuts into their bottom lines, too.

Why it matters: Hospitals and drug companies aren't always allies, and hospitals aren't likely to lobby very hard solely on pharma's behalf. But the industry could become another powerful opponent for Democrats if its own profits are on the line.

Trump voices support for Saturday's pro-Capitol riots rally

Photo: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Former President Trump on Thursday expressed solidarity with people facing prosecution in connection to the Capitol insurrection.

Why it matters: The statement was issued ahead of Saturday's rally to protest the treatment of Capitol rioters. Over 600 known federal defendants face charges related to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Clinton-linked lawyer indicted in investigation of FBI's Russia probe

Photo: Eric Baradat/AFP via Getty Images

A grand jury has returned an indictment against Michael Sussmann, a lawyer whose firm represented the 2016 Clinton campaign, for lying to the FBI about not representing "any client" when he presented them with allegations about a secret Trump Organization back-channel to a Russian bank.

Why it matters: It's the second criminal charge stemming from special counsel John Durham's review of possible misconduct by the intelligence community and prosecutors who investigated the 2016 Trump campaign's ties to Russia.