Jun 24, 2018

A brave new world: Can robots be sued?

Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios

The advancement of AI-fueled technologies like robotics and self-driving cars is creating a confusing legal landscape that leaves manufacturers, programmers and even robots themselves open to liability, according to legal scholars who study AI.

Why it matters: As autonomous vehicles take to the road and get into collisions, drivers, insurers and manufacturers want to know who — or what — is liable when a harmful mistake occurs. The degree of liability comes down to whether AI is treated as a product, service or a human decision-maker.

Case study: Some carmakers, including Volvo, Google and Mercedes, have already said they would accept full liability for their vehicles' actions when they are in autonomous mode.

Even without such a pledge, it's likely that manufacturers would end up paying if their autonomous car caused harm. If the offending car were considered a defective product, its maker could be held liable under strict product-design standards, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits and expensive product recalls — like Takata faced for its dangerous airbags.

  • But if a car's driving software were considered a service, it could be charged with behaving negligently, the way a reckless human driver might.
  • Treating human and AI drivers the same would "level the playing field" and prevent costly product-liability lawsuits, according to Nathan Greenblatt, an IP lawyer at Sidley Austin.
  • Yes, but: Exactly who counts as the manufacturer might not be immediately obvious, says John Kingston, a professor who studies AI and law at the University of Brighton. If a self-driving car kills a pedestrian, the car company might be considered the manufacturer, he says — but it could also be a subcontractor who wrote the software, or even a hardware supplier that produced a faulty camera.
  • Allianz, the insurance giant, predicted in a recent report that product liability insurance would someday become compulsory in order to protect drivers when they've put their cars in autonomous mode.

Another possibility: Going deeper into the system, the AI itself could be held responsible, according to Gabriel Hallevy, a law professor at Ono Academic College in Israel, who wrote a book about AI and criminal negligence. That still means its programmer or manufacturer could be found negligent as well, or even an accomplice to a crime.

  • But it's hard to punish AI if it's found guilty. The simplest sanction would be to decommission the offending robot or the program. But there are more creative options: Hallevy suggested that AI found to have broken a law could be shut off for a period of time — the equivalent of a prison sentence — or even be required to perform community service, like cleaning the streets or helping out at the public library.

What's needed: New laws may be in order to deal with errant AI, says Kingston. Many laws, for example, hinge on whether a reasonable person would have acted a certain way. AI, clever as it may be in its own field, doesn't yet have the background knowledge or common sense it would need to emulate a reasonable person's decision-making.

What to expect: The first big AI liability case will likely cause a temporary chill in AI development, says Kingston, as company lawyers scramble to protect their employers. But in the long term, he says, clearer guidelines would be beneficial for AI research and development.

Go deeper

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 5 p.m. ET: 846,156 — Total deaths: 41,494 — Total recoveries: 176,171.
  2. U.S.: Leads the world in confirmed cases. Total confirmed cases as of 5 p.m. ET: 181,099 — Total deaths: 3,606 — Total recoveries: 6,038.
  3. Business updates: Should you pay your rent or mortgage during the coronavirus pandemic? Find out if you are protected under the CARES Act.
  4. Public health updates: More than 400 long-term care facilities across the U.S. report patients with coronavirus — Older adults and people with underlying health conditions are more at risk, new data shows.
  5. Federal government latest: The White House and other institutions are observing several models to better understand and prepare cities for when the coronavirus is expected to peak in the U.S.
  6. U.S.S. Theadore Roosevelt: Captain of nuclear aircraft carrier docked in Guam pleaded the U.S. Navy for more resources after more than 100 members of his crew tested positive.
  7. What should I do? Answers about the virus from Axios expertsWhat to know about social distancingQ&A: Minimizing your coronavirus risk.
  8. Other resources: CDC on how to avoid the virus, what to do if you get it.

Subscribe to Mike Allen's Axios AM to follow our coronavirus coverage each morning from your inbox.

Paying rent in a pandemic

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

For many people who've lost jobs or income because of the coronavirus pandemic, tomorrow presents a stressful decision: Do you pay your rent or mortgage?

Why it matters: The new CARES Act that was signed by President Trump on Friday protects homeowners and renters who are suffering from the response to the coronavirus pandemic — but it's not “a one-size-fits-all policy rulebook,” a congressional aide tells Axios.

DOJ watchdog finds flaws in FISA process beyond Carter Page application

Carter Page. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The Justice Department inspector general found errors in 29 out of 29 randomized FBI applications for acquiring wiretap warrants through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, according to a report released Tuesday.

Why it matters: The broad DOJ audit of the FISA program stems from a damning investigation into the FBI's surveillance of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page, which uncovered "serious performance failures" by some FBI officials during the Russia probe. The IG's final findings come as Congress debates whether to renew the authority it grants to the FISA courts.