Updated Jun 26, 2018

The Supreme Court decision Silicon Valley is reading

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

The ripples of a Monday Supreme Court ruling in favor of American Express could be felt on the West Coast, with some arguing it would make it harder for antitrust enforcers to take on big online platforms like Google, Facebook and Amazon.

Why that matters: Many of tech’s most profitable firms have created two-sided markets: Google and Facebook serve consumers on one side and marketers on another. Uber links up riders and drivers. Amazon serves customers and also the merchants who use its platform. All these situations make defining a monopoly more difficult.

Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with a lower court that when making an antitrust call on a company that does transactions across a two-sided marketplace, you have to consider whether the whole enterprise is anticompetitive — not just one side of the market. (The case in question concerned American Express' policy discouraging merchants who tried to push customers to use cards with lower merchant fees.)

Yes, but: Thomas split up companies that create two sided markets into two categories, and only applied his analysis to one of them.

  1. He said that his analysis could be applied to “two-sided transaction platforms” that “facilitate a single, simultaneous transaction between participants," including Amex.
  2. But he argued that the courts could consider only one side of a two-sided marketplace “when the impacts of indirect network effects and relative pricing in that market are minor,” as is true with a newspaper where readers and advertisers aren’t selling anything directly to one another.

Category #2 could be seen as covering Facebook and Google, said Lina Khan, the Director of Legal Policy at the Open Markets Institute, as opposed to companies like Amazon that set up more direct transactions between buyer and seller. “I think instances where you have targeted advertisements funding another business that you’re providing to a user, I think those types of cases would risk falling into the type of category that Thomas tries to create,” she said of his reference to newspapers.

Khan, who argues for more vigorous antitrust enforcement, said she worried Thomas’ ruling creates a murky standard where companies will argue they fall into Category #1 to avoid antitrust enforcers.

The other side: “This case, for the tech industry, simply represents a clarification of the dynamics of two-sided business models captured in a legal decision,” said Marianela López-Galdos, Director of Competition and Regulatory Policy at CCIA, a tech lobbying group that filed a legal brief supporting some of Amex’s case. “I don’t think it gives a free pass to the tech industry.”

What’s next: Cowen Washington Research Group analyst Paul Gallant wrote in a Monday evening note that he’ll be watching for reaction from DOJ antitrust chief Makan Delrahim and Federal Trade Commission chairman Joe Simons — who is going to hold public hearings on the competitive impact of tech platforms — to see how the ruling could affect their approach to tech cases.

Get more stories like this by signing up for our daily tech newsletter, Login. 

Go deeper

Atlanta mayor on Trump's riot response: "He speaks and he makes it worse"

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms responded on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday to President Trump's tweets and comments about the mass protests that have swept across the United States, urging him to "just stop talking."

What she's saying: "This is like Charlottesville all over again. He speaks and he makes it worse. There are times when you should just be quiet. And I wish that he would just be quiet."

Black Americans' competing crises

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

For many black Americans, this moment feels like a crisis within a crisis within a crisis.

The big picture: It's not just George Floyd's killing by police. Or the deaths of EMT Breonna Taylor and jogger Ahmaud Arbery. Or the demeaning of birdwatcher Christian Cooper and journalist Omar Jimenez. Or the coronavirus pandemic's disproportionate harm to African Americans. It's that it's all happening at once.

Updated 2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Amnesty International: U.S. police must end militarized response to protests

Washington State Police use tear gas to disperse a crowd in Seattle during a demonstration protesting the death of George Floyd. Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images

Amnesty International issued a statement on Sunday morning calling for an end to militarized policing in several U.S. cities and the use of "excessive force" against demonstrators protesting police brutality.

Why it matters: The human rights group said police across the country were "failing their obligations under international law to respect and facilitate the right to peaceful protest, exacerbating a tense situation and endangering the lives of protesters."