Exclusive: Free-market groups push back on processed food definition
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Stock: Getty Images
Free-market consumer groups are pushing back against the Trump administration's effort to set a definition for ultra-processed foods, according to a letter shared first with Axios.
Why it matters: It's the latest example of a rift within the GOP base over health and nutrition policy.
Driving the news: Sixteen organizations focused on promoting consumer rights and limiting regulation argue that creating a new classification for ultra-processed food would make groceries less affordable due to the costs of reformulating and packaging products.
- They're urging White House budget director Russell Vought to block the creation of a federal definition.
- Groups signed onto the message include the Independent Women, the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council and Consumer Action for a Strong Economy — which receives funding from the Consumer Brands Association.
Catch up quick: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced earlier this month that the administration has submitted a white paper with the first proposed federal definition of ultra-processed foods to the White House for review.
The organizations say science doesn't support a blanket definition, and that creating a federal standard would confuse consumers and expose businesses to additional lawsuits.
- It would "pit the government against food manufacturers, retailers, farmers, and their hundreds of millions of consumers, who are grappling with a growing patchwork of different labeling and ingredient mandates at the state level," the letter reads.
What we're watching: Policymakers have scheduled meetings with interest groups on the proposed definition through at least mid-September.
