The world is richer than ever — but it's delicate
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Shoshana Gordon/Axios
The world is wealthier than ever before. But it is built on ever-more stretched valuations of paper assets, rather than real output. How that wedge resolves itself will determine the future of the world's major economies.
The big picture: That's the implication of new research out this week from the consulting firm McKinsey, which lays out both the shocking numerical scale of global wealth accumulation — and the hazards created by its composition.
- The reliance on higher valuations, as opposed to increased stock of capital that creates real output, fuels the risk of a painful correction through either falling asset prices or prolonged inflation.
- There is a sunnier scenario, however, in which the world essentially grows into high asset valuations with help from an AI-driven productivity boom.
By the numbers: McKinsey researchers find that total global assets rose to $1.8 quadrillion last year, from $1.7 quadrillion in 2024. (A quadrillion is a thousand trillion.)
- Global household wealth reached $570 trillion, the researchers find, up $40 trillion from 2025.
- But only 20% of that gain came from real capital formation: net new investment in machinery and equipment, homes and buildings, infrastructure and intellectual property. The rest was driven by a mix of inflation and rising market valuations of existing assets.
- That's a more extreme version of a longstanding pattern. From 2000 to 2024, 30% of the rise in global wealth was from net investment.
What they're saying: "You could say that every asset on this planet is now financialized," Jan Mischke, a partner with the McKinsey Global Institute, tells Axios.
Zoom out: There are several plausible ways that these elevated asset valuations can resolve themselves.
- One is simply the muddling-along approach — low growth translates into low interest rates, which means high valuations simply persist. That's more or less what happened across major economies in the 2010s.
- But more dramatic possibilities are in play, some happy and some scary.
Zoom in: The best case for the global economy would be for productivity to surge, generating a boom in GDP growth — from AI or other sources — that justifies the high valuations of stocks and other forms of wealth. That's essentially what happened in the late 1990s.
- A more grim possibility is that a sustained surge in inflation chips away at the real value of assets, bringing them back into line with historic norms while leaving people poorer in real terms. That arguably happened in 2021-2022.
- The most worrying possibility of all would be for a resetting of global asset prices of the sorts seen in 2002 and 2008.
The intrigue: "Inflated scenarios have a history of mean reverting, including in benign ways, like a productivity acceleration," Mischke says. "But every now and again you also have a big debt crisis or market crash."
- "The real question for us in the U.S. is, will productivity and GDP be higher, in which case you're in a productivity surge, or do we end up in an inflationary scenario?" says Arvind Govindarajan, another McKinsey partner and co-author.
The bottom line: What does this super-big-picture analysis mean for those of us just trying to make wise business or personal financial decisions?
- "The uncertainty of the economic outlook is much wider than it usually is," Mischke says. "You better harden your balance sheet a little bit, have some operational flexibility and plan scenarios."
