Possible Epstein files vote: How more records could be released
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and Rep. James Walkinshaw (D-Va.) outside the US Capitol on Oct. 15. Photo: Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva's (D-Ariz.) long-awaited swearing-in Wednesday could set in motion a months-long bipartisan push to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files — but the bill is not likely to pass the GOP-led Senate.
The big picture: However, the measure has public opinion in its sails: Some three-quarters of Americans want the Epstein files released in full with victims' names removed.
- The potential vote puts Republicans in a difficult position and primes lawmakers for a contentious fight over the case that splintered the MAGA world.
- Even if the legislation somehow passed, President Trump, who has slammed the Epstein scrutiny as a Democratic "hoax," would have to sign it.
Yes, but: As hunger for more information about the infamous sex offender's case persists, information has come out in other ways, such as through the House Oversight Committee's subpoena of Epstein's estate.
The latest: Emails from Epstein's estate mentioning Trump by name that were released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee Wednesday are sure to further inflame lawmakers' scrutiny of Epstein's web of powerful connections.
When will Grijalva be sworn in?
Johnson will perform Grijalva's ceremonial swearing in at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday at 4pm ET, Axios' Andrew Solender and Kate Santaliz report.
- Grijalva has pledged to be the key 218th signature on the Epstein discharge petition. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who's led the bipartisan effort with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), wrote on X Tuesday that the "final signature for the Epstein discharge petition will happen tomorrow."
- Grijalva said on CNN's "The Source" she plans to confront Johnson during her swearing-in, framing the 50-day delay as "undemocratic."
Friction point: Democrats have alleged that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) was dragging his feet because Grijalva, after winning a September special election, would affix the final signature on the discharge petition.
- Johnson, however, said he was waiting until after the record-shattering shutdown lifted. The speaker has kept the House out of session during the lapse.
When could a vote on releasing Epstein documents happen?
Once the discharge petition's signature threshold is met, it is set to ripen for seven legislative days. Then, Johnson has two legislative days to set a vote.
- That would likely tee up a vote for early December, after the House returns from its Thanksgiving recess.
The other side: Johnson has called accusations that the delay was tied to the Epstein petition a "partisan manufactured thing."
- He's also framed the discharge petition effort as unnecessary, given the House Oversight Committee's ongoing investigation. But he's indicated he wouldn't block a vote.
What they're saying: "This is about transparency and justice for survivors," Khanna said in a statement provided to Axios. "Speaker Johnson has promised he'll allow a vote on our bill. Let's bring it to the floor."
Yes, but: If the bill clears the House, it would head to the GOP-controlled Senate and would have to be signed by the president.
- Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), when asked by CNN in September whether he'd put the bill on the floor, said he's "not sure what that achieves."
What other ways could the Epstein files be released?
The House Oversight Committee has released a trove of documents from Epstein's estate, including 20,000 pages publicized Wednesday.
- In September, Democrats on the panel also publicly shared the now-infamous doodle and note they allege Trump left in a birthday book compiled for Epstein. However, the White House denied Trump drew the picture or signed the note.
- The committee has also called a number of prominent individuals to testify, including Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Zoom out: Lawmakers have also used hearings on Capitol Hill to press administration officials on the case and their handling of it.
- Last month, Attorney General Pam Bondi dismissed questions about the Epstein investigation while appearing before a Senate panel.
Catch up quick: In July, the DOJ and FBI's conclusion that there is no evidence Epstein kept a "client list" or was murdered sparked outrage and blindsided Trump's base.
- Bondi released more than 100 pages of documents that she described as the "first phase of the declassified Epstein files" in February — but faced scrutiny over a lack of significant new revelations.
- The administration requested that grand jury transcripts from Epstein and Maxwell's cases be unsealed, but was blocked by judges. One judge wrote that the materials would not bring any "meaningful new information" to light, and another described the effort as a "diversion."
- He added that the government is the "logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public" of the files and noted the administration's prior commitment to releasing additional documents.
Go deeper: House Dems release Epstein emails alleging Trump may have known about his behavior
