Trump senior adviser files defamation suit against The Daily Beast
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

Chris LaCivita at a Trump campaign even in 2024. Photo: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Senior Trump political adviser Chris LaCivita has filed a defamation suit against The Daily Beast, alleging that the outlet published "malicious" and "damag[ing] reporting about him during the 2024 campaign "with reckless disregard for the truth."
Why it matters: The lawsuit is the latest example of those in President Trump's orbit aggressively targeting news organizations they regard as unfair and adversarial.
- Trump last year filed a defamation suit against ABC News after anchor George Stephanopoulos inaccurately said on-air that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping the writer E. Jean Carroll. ABC settled the suit for $15 million. (Trump was found liable in a civil suit for sexually assaulting Carroll, not raping her as defined by New York law.)
- Trump has filed a $20 billion lawsuit against CBS News, alleging it deceptively edited an interview with Democratic candidate Kamala Harris in the run-up to the election.
- The White House barred the Associated Press from access to the Oval Office and Air Force One because the outlet declined to call the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America," as Trump mandated in an executive order.
The background: LaCivita's lawsuit centers on an October 2024 article by investigative reporter Michael Isikoff that originally asserted LaCivita had made $22 million off the Trump campaign.
- LaCivita, who was Trump's co-campaign manager, has aggressively pushed back on the allegations, saying the vast majority of the money paid for advertising.
- After the story was published, LaCivita and his lawyers sent three letters demanding the outlet retract its reporting. His team pointed them to publicly available campaign finance reports documenting the expenditures.
- The Daily Beast edited Isikoff's story to say LaCivita had made $19.2 million off the campaign. The publication also removed a podcast it had posted featuring Isikoff talking about his reporting.
- The outlet has declined additional demands by LaCivita and his lawyers to make further changes or retractions, saying it "stand[s] by our journalism."
What they're saying: "Defendant's false statements created the false impression that Mr. LaCivita was charging exorbitant rates for his services and personally enriching himself at the expense of the campaign, thereby harming his reputation as an honest, reasonable, and ethical political operative," the lawsuit says.
- "As a direct and proximate result of the publication of the defamatory statements, Mr. LaCivita has suffered special damages, including damage to his reputation and loss of business income," it says.
- The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Richmond, Va., points to extensive coverage Isikoff's story received and notes that the Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump group, ran TV ads based on the story.
The other side: "The Daily Beast stands by its reporting on Chris LaCivita. His lawsuit is meritless and a transparent attempt to intimidate the Beast and silence the independent press," the outlet said in a statement.
- "The Beast will defend itself vigorously and looks forward to following the money to confirm where every penny flowed in LaCivita's LLC."
The intrigue: Trump — who has long been suspicious of his political consultants profiting from his campaigns — initially was infuriated by the Daily Beast story. After LaCivita ran Trump through the numbers and offered an explanation, Trump suggested LaCivita sue the outlet.
Zoom in: LaCivita is represented by celebrity lawyer Mark Geragos, known for defending high-profile figures such as Michael Jackson, Winona Ryder and Chris Brown.
- Also representing LaCivita is Jonathan Shaw, whose firm, the Dhillon Group, was founded by Harmeet Dhillon, who in January was nominated by Trump to be assistant attorney general for civil rights.
- LaCivita isn't seeking a specific amount in damages, but rather for an amount to be determined at trial.
- The case is funded by the Republican National Committee, according to a person familiar with the arrangement.
The big picture: Defamation cases can be difficult to prove.
- But ABC's decision to settle with Trump reflects how lawsuits related to the president's operation are putting pressure on news organizations.
