TrueUSD was not very true
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.

The issuers of the stablecoin TrueUSD (TUSD) were not honest about what was backing it, according to a complaint that preceded a settlement with the SEC, which was announced Tuesday.
Why it matters: Stablecoins that say they are based on 1-to-1 backing with U.S. dollars need to have those dollars on hand.
Friction point: TrueUSD was not, the SEC alleges, backing its tokens with dollars, at least not entirely.
- Instead, it was heavily investing deposits into some kind of commodity fund, presumably to earn profits for the issuer.
- But that's not how the complaint says it represented the backing to its customers.
💠Our thought bubble: I wrote about TrustToken's initial fundraise six years ago, when it was offered on the token sales site that was pickiest about projects it would support, CoinList.
- But its stablecoin always lagged the market leaders (despite decent uptake) and, in 2020, it announced a sale to "an Asian consortium" that just seemed very off.
- Note that the period the SEC criticizes starts just a few weeks before that announcement.
By the numbers: There's still almost a half-billion in TUSD in the market, but that's well down from the nearly $4 billion in supply it once represented.
The bottom line: The payments weren't very high in this case, a few hundred thousand dollars between various entities.
- But we still don't really know who took the project over.
