A bipartisan pushback on noncompete agreements
Add Axios as your preferred source to
see more of our stories on Google.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
The Senate may soon be taking on noncompete agreements, after a rare bipartisan bill to declare them illegal in most instances was introduced and has gained support.
What it means: The Workforce Mobility Act would ban the use of noncompete agreements except in connection with the dissolution of a partnership or the sale of a business.
- Seven states have already passed restrictions or banned the agreements in most cases.
Why it matters: Previously a rare clause, companies have recently been instituting noncompete agreements into the contracts of "janitors, receptionists, customer service workers, fledgling journalists, even employees of a day care center," according to analysis from the Economic Policy Institute.
- A 2015 study found that 40% of Americans have had a noncompete agreement at some point in their careers.
The big picture: "Workers’ inability to leave their jobs because of non-compete agreements and similar limitations has also contributed to the wage stagnation of recent decades," legal experts Jane Flanagan and Terri Gerstein write for EPI's Working Economics blog.
- "Two studies released just last month found that non-compete agreements adversely affected wages and job mobility."
- "Non-compete agreements aren’t really about trade secrets anymore. They’re about limiting workers’ bargaining power."
Go deeper:
