The Kentucky Medicaid ruling is a setback for Trump
Republican governors and the Trump administration both suffered a serious setback on Friday when a federal judge blocked Kentucky's version of Medicaid work requirements from taking effect.
Why it matters: Work requirements are among the most significant changes the Trump administration has made so far in health policy. The new rules are also a critical part of conservatives' effort to frame Medicaid as a welfare program.
The catch: That's exactly why the policy ran into trouble in court.
Driving the news: U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled Friday that the Health and Human Services Department had not sufficiently demonstrated that work requirements would further Medicaid's goals as a health care program.
- That's a requirement of the waiver process under which HHS has been approving work requirements.
- "The Secretary never once mentions the estimated 95,000 people who would lose coverage, which gives the Court little reason to think that he seriously grappled with the bottomline impact on healthcare," Boasberg wrote.
What to watch: Boasberg's ruling only applies to Kentucky, not the other states where HHS has approved work requirements. But this will not be the last legal challenge, and if more judges follow Boasberg's lead, the administration's effort to redefine Medicaid could end up backfiring.
- In Kentucky, Gov. Matt Bevin has said he will back out of the Medicaid expansion entirely if he ultimately loses this litigation.
- In the meantime, Boasberg gave HHS another chance to come back with a stronger justification for the new rules.
- Maine Gov. Paul LePage has, unsurprisingly, vetoed the latest effort to implement the state's expansion, which voters approved last year.
- Republicans in Idaho are hoping to formally cement the party's opposition to an upcoming ballot initiative on Medicaid expansion.
- The Tennesseean asks why Tennessee has not joined the expansion ranks.