A woman placing a bet at a race. Photo: Clint Hughes/PA Images via Getty Images

Sports betting has been legalized in eight states so far in 2018, with more on the way, but the Wire Act of 1961 may be standing in the way of bettors being able to bet across those states.

Why it matters: Federal legislators are considering changes for the Wire Act, but it's unclear what those changes are and whether they'll impact bettors moving forward.

The big picture: The Wire Act bans bettors from transmitting gambling data and information for sports betting across states through the use of wire services such as telecommunications.

  • Multiple states offer sports betting options. Transmitting bets between those states is legal, but if those bets are transmitted between intermediary states, it may not be.
  • "I’m in New Jersey, you’re in Las Vegas. If I place a bet and that bet travels through Texas ... does that violate the Wire Act? It’s the open question of intermediate routing," Oklahoma State University assistant professor John Holden told Axios.

Background: The Wire Act was originally created as a weapon against organized crime. Mob members would use wire services to transmit data on bets for rigged events across the country. This act gave the federal government a way to charge them.

  • This bill was not meant to punish casual bettors and wasn't an issue when sports betting was illegal.
  • The act was also drawn up at a time where the Internet didn't exist. Now it must be clarified.

Yes, but: The act is hardly ever enforced. It's too unclear federally and, now, state laws vary across the country. For example, the act could've been used to punish FanDuel and DraftKings, Holden said, but it never was.

Be smart: Whether the rule is changed or expanded, "it's of no consequence if it's not being enforced," Holden said.

Go deeper

Updated 16 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Harvard and MIT sue Trump administration over rule barring foreign students from online classes

A Harvard Law School graduate on campus before attending an online graduation ceremony on May 28. Photo: Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Harvard and MIT on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security to block federal guidance that would largely bar foreign college students from taking classes if their universities move classes entirely online in the fall.

The big picture: Colleges, which often rely heavily on tuition from international students, face a unique challenge to safely get students back to class during the coronavirus pandemic. Some elite institutions, like Harvard, have already made the decision to go virtual.

Updated 1 hour ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 9 a.m. ET: 11,856,991 — Total deaths: 544,871 — Total recoveries — 6,473,170Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 9 a.m. ET: 2,996,333 — Total deaths: 131,481 — Total recoveries: 936,476 — Total tested: 36,878,106Map.
  3. Public health: Deaths are rising in hotspots — Déjà vu sets in as testing issues rise and PPE dwindles.
  4. Travel: How the pandemic changed mobility habits, by state.
  5. 🎧Podcast: A misinformation "infodemic" is here.

Facebook auditors say it's failing on civil rights

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

The findings from a new civil rights audit commissioned and released by Facebook show that the tech giant repeatedly failed to address issues of hatred, bigotry and manipulation on its platform.

Why it matters: The report comes as Facebook confronts a growing advertiser boycott and criticism for prioritizing freedom of speech over limiting misinformation and protecting users targeted by hate speech.