The jury is still out, but cell phones probably won't cause cancer in humans. (Credit: Chris Jackson/Getty Images)

The kind of radiation emitted by cell phones increases the risk of heart cancer in mice, according to an NIH-funded report released today. But don't ditch your phones just yet: despite numerous studies, there's still no strong evidence cell phones cause cancer in humans.

Be smart: These rats were exposed to high levels of radiation over their entire bodies. This is not how humans are exposed to cell phone radiation. When asked in a press conference if he intends to change his cell phone use, or tell his children to do so, study author John Bucher said, unequivocally, "no."

The details: This is the most thorough animal study on cell phones and cancer to date.

  • Researchers exposed both mice and rats to varying amounts of radiation. They were exposed in 10-minute increments (10 on, 10 off) for 9 total hours of exposure each day.
  • Exposure started before they were born, and continued for two years.
  • The wavelengths were equivalent to 2g and 3g connections, which were common at the time the study was started. )Today, phones still use 2g and 3g wavelengths when making calls, but not when using data.)

The dosage: The highest levels of radiation the rats and mice were exposed to were equal to the highest levels cell phones are allowed to emit. Cell phones only produce that much radiation when they're struggling to connect to a tower.

  • The amount of radiation that people experience from using their phones is "very, very, very much lower," Bucher said.
  • It's common for studies like this to use improbable amounts of a potential toxin or carcinogen: If no effects are found under worst-case-scenarios, there's no need to keep testing lower doses. Future studies will figure out what the risk is for humans in real-world scenarios, but for now it seems minimal.

The definitive findings: 6% of male rats developed a rare type of heart cancer. The same types of cancer have been linked to cell phone usage in previous studies. No female rats and none of the mice had increased cancer rates. The authors suggest that there is "some evidence" radiation can cause this type of cancer in rats. That's the second-highest classification they use, after 'clear evidence'. Again, more research is needed to determine the effects on humans.

The Food and Drug Administration said in a statement it believes current levels of cell phone exposure are safe.

The context: A lot of things can increase your risk of cancer. Some — like smoking, sun exposure or drinking alcohol — can have a large effect. Others, like coffee consumption or eating gingko, have a less clear effect. Cancer rates have been dropping for the last several decades, in part because we’re smoking less and wearing sunscreen.

1 weird thing: The irradiated rats actually lived longer than the control rats, because they had lower rates of a common rat kidney disease. That's probably because similar types of radiation can decrease inflammation.

Go deeper

Updated 1 hour ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 6:30 a.m. ET: 30,199,007 — Total deaths: 946,490— Total recoveries: 20,544, 967Map
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 6:30 a.m. ET: 6,675,593 — Total deaths: 197,644 — Total recoveries: 2,540,334 — Total tests: 90,710,730Map
  3. Politics: Former Pence aide says she plans to vote for Joe Biden, accusing Trump of costing lives in his coronavirus response.
  4. Health: Pew: 49% of Americans wouldn't get COVID-19 vaccine if available today Pandemic may cause cancer uptick The risks of moving too fast on a vaccine — COVID-19 racial disparities extend to health coverage losses.
  5. Business: Retail sales return to pre-coronavirus trend.
Mike Allen, author of AM
2 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Scoop: Mike Bloomberg's anti-chaos theory

CNN's Anderson Cooper questions Joe Biden last night at a drive-in town hall in Moosic, Pa., outside Scranton. Photo: CNN

Mike Bloomberg's $100 million Florida blitz begins today and will continue "wall to wall" in all 10 TV markets through Election Day, advisers tell me.

Why it matters: Bloomberg thinks that Joe Biden putting away Florida is the most feasible way to head off the national chaos we could have if the outcome of Trump v. Biden remained uncertain long after Election Day.

Biden's hardline Russia reset

Photo Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios. Getty Images photos: Mark Reinstein

When he talks about Russia, Joe Biden has sounded like Ronald Reagan all summer, setting up a potential Day 1 confrontation with Russian President Vladimir Putin if Biden were to win.

Why it matters: Biden has promised a forceful response against Russia for both election interference and alleged bounty payments to target American troops in Afghanistan. But being tougher than President Trump could be the easy part. The risk is overdoing it and making diplomacy impossible.