Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios

Dating platforms are rolling out design features to mitigate the impact of offline prejudices migrating onto dating apps.

Why it matters: Though online dating can connect us to types of people we wouldn’t ordinarily meet, bias and discrimination among users can turn people away from dating altogether.

Details: Online dating often sheds light on how wider social biases are intertwined with our intimate lives.

Where it stands: Platforms are introducing new features and policies to address the problem of discrimination.

  • Grindr launched its “Kindr” campaign featuring new community guidelines, stricter enforcement of non-discrimination policies, and a video series that documents discrimination and stigma. But some users are skeptical.
  • In its #AllTypesAllSwipes update, Tinder provided more expansive and inclusive gender options.
  • OkCupid now allows users to share their preferred gender pronouns.
  • DaddyHunt teaches users about the stigma of HIV, and offers a “Live Stigma-Free” profile badge that shows a user is “open to dating someone of any [HIV] status.”

Between the lines: These changes make apps more accessible and inclusive without limiting people’s choices around love and sex.

The bottom line: In an era of entrenched social inequality and polarization, design changes could help to reduce bias, stigma and discrimination for the millions of people who rely on dating apps. Platforms cannot remain neutral — they should embrace this task and design to bring people together with dignity in pursuit of love.

Jevan Hutson researches technology policy and social computing. A law student at the University of Washington, he holds a master's in information science from Cornell and has worked at the ACLU, Nintendo and Boeing.

Go deeper: Read Hutson's paper on app design and bias and more research on social integration and online dating.

Go deeper

Big Tech marshals a right-leaning army of allies for antitrust fight

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

As tech's giants prepare to face off with antitrust enforcers this summer, they will draw support from an array of predominantly right-leaning defenders ranging from influential former government officials to well-connected think tanks.

The big picture: The Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission and the states have multiple investigations of monopolistic behavior underway targeting Facebook and Google, with other giants like Amazon and Apple also facing rising scrutiny. Many observers expect a lawsuit against Google to land this summer.

John Roberts' long game

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is not the revolutionary that conservative activists want him to be.

He moves slower than they want, sides with liberals more than they want, and trims his sails in ways they find maddening. But he is still deeply and unmistakably conservative, pulling the law to the right — at his own pace and in his own image.

2 hours ago - Health

The U.S.' new default coronavirus strategy: herd immunity

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

By letting the coronavirus surge through the population with only minimal social distancing measures in place, the U.S. has accidentally become the world’s largest experiment in herd immunity.

Why it matters: Letting the virus spread while minimizing human loss is doable, in theory. But it requires very strict protections for vulnerable people, almost none of which the U.S. has established.