President Trump's decision Friday to burst like the Kool-Aid Man into oil market debates — bashing OPEC in a tweet over "artificially high" prices — has generated a burst of analyses about what motivated his comments.

Why it matters: The tweet could herald a newly-aggressive posture toward the cartel as it weighs the longer-term future of the production-limiting deal with Russia that's currently slated to last through 2018.

What they're saying . . .

Gasoline prices: One through-line in the analysts' reactions is that Trump could be seeking to preemptively steer and deflect consumer ire at rising gasoline prices heading into summer and election season.

  • The Energy Information Administration forecasts that regular gas will average $2.74 nationwide in the April-September driving season, compared to $2.41 last year.
  • A related thing: When it comes to what's good for U.S. oil producers (higher oil prices) and what consumers want (low gasoline prices), Trump will choose the latter.
  • "[P]olitical mathematics tends to be of a first-order nature: high oil prices only directly benefit a small number of voters, but low gasoline prices directly benefit all voters," ClearView Energy Partners said in a note.

Iran and Venezuela: The tweet could be a further sign that Trump is preparing to end waivers of Iranian energy sanctions in May, which would remove some barrels from the global market (there's lots of debate about how much), thereby putting more upward pressure on prices.

  • "I think the market should take it as another indication that [reimposition of sanctions] is going to happen," said Hedgeye Risk Management's Joe McMonigle in video commentary on their site.
  • What's next: "The implications of it are going to be, I think, pressure on by Trump on OPEC, and Gulf producers in particular who are aligned with him on this Iran policy to increase production because of the disruption," he said.
  • On a related note, the administration may impose sanctions against Venezuela's oil sector.

Congress and Aramco: The Rapidan Energy Group, in a short note, said the jab at "artificially high" prices carries an "implied threat" of exhuming legislation floating around Congress for almost two decades that would prompt the U.S. to sue OPEC members under anti-trust law — a bill known as "NOPEC."

  • "Any presidential support for the NOPEC bill — or even ordering an investigation of market manipulation — would make Riyadh more gun shy about listing Aramco in New York."

LOL, nothing matters: ClearView has a worthwhile disclaimer on their note: "In the absence of further commentary or a detailed explication by the President’s advisors, we are inclined to suggest that sometimes a tweet is just a tweet."

Go deeper

Updated 1 hour ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 4:30 p.m. ET: 12,128,406 — Total deaths: 551,552 — Total recoveries — 6,650,675Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 4:30 p.m. ET: 3,088,913 — Total deaths: 132,934 — Total recoveries: 953,420 — Total tested: 36,979,745Map.
  3. Public health: More young people are spreading the virus Cases rise in 33 statesFlorida reports highest single-day death toll since pandemic began.
  4. Science: World Health Organization acknowledges airborne transmission of coronavirus.
  5. 1 🐂 thing: How the world could monitor for potential pandemic animal viruses.
2 hours ago - Science

More young people are getting — and spreading — the coronavirus

Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios

More young people are being infected with the coronavirus, and even though they're less likely to die from it, experts warn the virus' spread among young adults may further fuel outbreaks across the United States.

Why it matters: Some people in their 20s and 30s face serious health complications from COVID-19, and a surge in cases among young people gives the virus a bigger foothold, increasing the risk of infection for more vulnerable people.

Joint Chiefs chairman condemns Confederate symbols

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley criticized Confederate symbols before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, and called the Civil War an "act of treason."

Why it matters: Milley said that minority service members — which he noted make up 43% of the U.S. military — may feel uncomfortable that Army bases are named for Confederate generals who "fought for an institution of slavery that may have enslaved one of their ancestors."