Michelle Edkins, BlackRock’s global head of investment stewardship, is a key figure in this spring’s annual shareholder meetings with publicly owned companies where climate change is expected to be featured prominently. I talked with Edkins for my latest Harder Line column on the topic.

Why she matters: BlackRock is the world’s largest investment firm, and Edkins was mentioned in a letter BlackRock Chairman and CEO Larry Fink sent earlier this year to companies imploring them to drive sustainable long-term growth, which includes a focus on climate.

On how Trump’s regulatory rollback is affecting investors’ thinking on climate:

This is [a] global and long-term issue. It’s a factor, but it’s not a driver of the approach we’re taking. Most oil and gas companies that really are going to move the needle are global. The idea that one change in government in one place is going to completely radically change the long-term horizon, I think, is really misguided.

On why climate change is becoming a bigger issue to Wall Street investors:

There’s a lot more joined-up thinking around climate risk than perhaps there was before. There’s a stronger probability of policy being made that will impact companies and their long-term business models.

On whether BlackRock will vote in support of shareholder resolutions on climate change, like it did last year for the first time with ExxonMobil and Occidental Petroleum:

If we’re not seeing progress in line with what we would expect from what companies have indicated [then we would vote in support of the resolutions]. We recognize that both companies and investors are on something of a learning curve.

On criticism that BlackRock isn’t following through on its rhetoric in Fink’s letter and elsewhere by not supporting more resolutions in the spring meeting process:

Focusing on just shareholder proposals on climate risk disclosure misses the point. What I would say to people who say only through voting can you make your voice heard, I would wholeheartedly disagree. Everyone has to use the engagement mechanism that makes the most sense for them. For BlackRock, as a large long-term investor, engagement is the mechanism that makes the most sense and we believe it is effective.

Go deeper

Updated 45 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 7 p.m. ET: 12,859,834 — Total deaths: 567,123 — Total recoveries — 7,062,085Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 7 p.m. ET: 3,297,501— Total deaths: 135,155 — Total recoveries: 1,006,326 — Total tested: 40,282,176Map.
  3. States: Florida smashes single-day record for new coronavirus cases with over 15,000 — NYC reports zero coronavirus deaths for first time since pandemic hit.
  4. Public health: Ex-FDA chief projects "apex" of South's coronavirus curve in 2-3 weeks — Coronavirus testing czar: Lockdowns in hotspots "should be on the table"
  5. Education: Betsy DeVos says schools that don't reopen shouldn't get federal funds — Pelosi accuses Trump of "messing with the health of our children."

Scoop: How the White House is trying to trap leakers

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

President Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, has told several White House staffers he's fed specific nuggets of information to suspected leakers to see if they pass them on to reporters — a trap that would confirm his suspicions. "Meadows told me he was doing that," said one former White House official. "I don't know if it ever worked."

Why it matters: This hunt for leakers has put some White House staffers on edge, with multiple officials telling Axios that Meadows has been unusually vocal about his tactics. So far, he's caught only one person, for a minor leak.

11 GOP congressional nominees support QAnon conspiracy

Lauren Boebert posing in her restaurant in Rifle, Colorado, on April 24. Photo: Emily Kask/AFP

At least 11 Republican congressional nominees have publicly supported or defended the QAnon conspiracy theory movement or some of its tenets — and more aligned with the movement may still find a way onto ballots this year.

Why it matters: Their progress shows how a fringe online forum built on unsubstantiated claims and flagged as a threat by the FBI is seeking a foothold in the U.S. political mainstream.