Patients are paying more out of their pockets for drugs. Photo: Jeffrey Greenberg / UIG via Getty Images

Health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers are blasting a proposed federal policy that would lower what patients pay out of pocket when they pick up their prescriptions, saying it coddles the pharmaceutical industry. But drug companies are firing back, accusing insurers and PBMs of keeping larger drug discounts for themselves and screwing over consumers in the process.

Get smart: Patients are caught in the middle of yet another health care industry gunfight.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services received more than 1,600 comments on a proposed rule that would make major changes to Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Part D drug program. One of the most contentious suggestions would mandate a certain amount of drug company rebates be applied to what people pay at the point of sale at pharmacies.

  • The issue: Say a drug has a list price of $1,000, and an insurer or PBM negotiates that down to $500. However, consumers have to pay coinsurance rates and deductibles based on the $1,000 list price, not the discounted amount. This has led to price shock for many people picking up their prescriptions, and more people are having trouble affording their medicines.
  • The federal government asked whether it would be a good idea to require insurers and PBMs that sell Medicare Part D plans to use a portion of those negotiated drug rebates to lower what people pay at the pharmacy counter.

Behind the curtain: The insurance and pharmacy benefit management industries are up in arms, and have no qualms about attacking drug makers. Insurers and PBMs keep some of the drug rebates for themselves, but they say those savings also go toward lowering insurance premiums.

  • If they are forced to use rebates to lower consumers' out-of-pocket costs, they will raise premiums in response, which will waste taxpayer money that funds Medicare Part D, according to lobbying groups and companies.
  • America's Health Insurance Plans and other insurer groups said the policy doesn't address the "root cause" of skyrocketing drug costs: "excessive list prices for drugs and excessive price increases that are set solely by and fully within the control of manufacturers."
  • It may encourage a race to the bottom among drug companies and make it easier for them to scale back their rebates, according to Express Scripts, one of the largest PBMs in the country.
  • The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, which lobbies on behalf of PBMs, argued such a proposal violates trade secrets law.
  • Aetna, CVS Health and UnitedHealth Group all bashed the policy, too. Aetna said drug companies would reap twice as much in savings over consumers.
  • The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America did its own math and said pushing rebates to the point of sale would save Medicare and consumers money, but admitted premiums would go up.

Between the lines: Both sides catch parts of the truth, which is best summarized by the independent Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. The policy would do nothing to lower the sticker price of drugs, and it would lead to higher drug premiums for seniors and disabled people. But health plans and PBMs profit a lot from the current setup, and the secretive nature of drug rebates keeps patients in the dark.

There's no signal or guarantee the federal proposal would move the needle on Medicare's drug affordability.

The bottom line: While the various health care camps fight to either keep the status quo or push for vested interests, drug prices continue to hammer the wallets of Medicare patients who need their medications.

Go deeper

Updated 33 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

  1. Politics: Pence chief of staff Marc Short tests positive for coronavirus — COVID-19 looms over White House Halloween celebrations.
  2. Health: Fauci says maybe we should mandate masks if people don't wear them — America was sick well before it ever got COVID-19.
  3. World: Polish President Andrzej Duda tests positive for COVID-19.
What Matters 2020

The missed opportunities for 2020 and beyond

Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photos: Jason Armond (Los Angeles Times), Noam Galai, Jabin Botsford (The Washington Post), Alex Wong/Getty Images

As the 2020 presidential campaign draws to a close, President Trump and Joe Biden have focused little on some of the most sweeping trends that will outlive the fights of the moment.

Why it matters: Both have engaged on some issues, like climate change and China, on their own terms, and Biden has addressed themes like economic inequality that work to his advantage. But others have gone largely unmentioned — a missed opportunity to address big shifts that are changing the country.

Pence chief of staff Marc Short tests positive for coronavirus

Marc Short with Katie Miller, Vice President Pence's communications director, in March. Photo: Doug Mills/The New York Times via Reuters

Marc Short, Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, tested positive for the coronavirus Saturday and is quarantining, according to a White House statement.

Why it matters: Short is Pence's closest aide, and was one of the most powerful forces on the White House coronavirus task force.