Demonstrators gather outside of the Supreme Court during oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford last October. Photo: Olivier Douliery/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week to sidestep what could have been a landmark challenge to partisan gerrymandering, citing procedural faults, has drawn attention to a case over North Carolina's GOP-gerrymandered congressional map, which legal experts believe offers clear evidence of direct injury to voting power.

The backdrop: Since its 1986 ruling that maps drawn by lawmakers can be unconstitutional when they “consistently degrade a voter's or a group of voters' influence on the political process,” the high court has never struck down one on the grounds of partisan gerrymandering. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote on Monday that plaintiffs in a case from Wisconsin lacked legal standing because the statewide challenge failed to prove their voting power had been diminished.

How we got here: A lower federal court ruled North Carolina's map as unconstitutional, saying that the GOP-controlled legislature was "motivated by invidious partisan intent” when it divided the state into 13 congressional districts — 10 of which are held by Republicans. It had also ordered the redrawing of lines ahead of this year’s midterms, but the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the order while an appeal is prepared and considered.

  • Republicans argued in filings that the Supreme Court should vacate the case, contending that the plaintiffs have no standing because the federal court that struck down the congressional map in January "based its decision entirely on statewide theories of harm."

Why this is different: Unlike the Wisconsin challenge, which argued that Republicans designed statewide legislative maps to gain electoral advantages, the North Carolina case has plaintiffs in each of the state’s 13 congressional districts.

  • Republicans admitted to skewing districts for partisan reasons. State Rep. David Lewis, a Republican who led the redrawing process, bragged that he had proposed “we draw the maps to give a partisan advantage to 10 Republicans and three Democrats because I do not believe it’s possible to draw a map with 11 Republicans and two Democrats."
  • Critics are also drawing attention to two Republican-leaning districts lawmakers created by splitting the heavily Democratic campus of North Carolina A&T State University — a historically black college in Greensboro.
"The record evidence of constitutional injury presented in our case is overwhelming [that] legislators intentionally cracked and packed millions of North Carolina voters to silence their political voice."
— Attorney Allison Riggs of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, which represents plaintiffs in the North Carolina case

What's next: The Supreme Court is expected to decide as soon as Monday whether to take up the case next term, which begins in October. Doing so would revive the prospect for a landmark ruling as election reformers hope to set a legal standard ahead of the 2020 census, which state legislatures will use to draw proportional electoral lines.

Go deeper

Uber to buy Postmates in $2.65 billion deal

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

Uber has agreed to acquire food delivery company Postmates for $2.65 billion in an all-stock deal, the companies announced Monday.

Why it matters: This is the latest merger for the food delivery space as the sector undergoes an ongoing market consolidation.

Analysts expect soaring stock market despite slashed earnings forecasts

Data: FactSet; Chart: Axios Visuals

Despite cutting expectations for companies' earnings by the most in history and revenue by the most since 2009, Wall Street analysts are getting increasingly bullish on the overall direction of the U.S. stock market.

What's happening: Equity analysts are expecting earnings in the second quarter to fall by 43.8% — the most since 2008's fourth quarter 69.1% decline.

Case growth outpacing testing in coronavirus hotspots

Data: The COVID Tracking Project. Note: Vermont and Hawaii were not included because they have fewer than 20 cases per day. Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

The United States' alarming rise in coronavirus cases isn't due to increased testing — particularly not where cases have grown fastest over the last month.

Why it matters: The U.S. doesn't yet know what it looks like when a pandemic rages on relatively unchecked after the health system has become overwhelmed. It may be about to find out.