Activists rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. Photo: Alex Wong / Getty Images

If public-sector unions have any hope of escaping a crippling blow at the Supreme Court, it will likely have to come from Justice Neil Gorsuch. He remained silent today while his conservative colleagues left little doubt that they’re headed toward a broad ruling against public unions — and that they’re well aware of the political consequences.

Why it matters: State and local governments are one of the few remaining strongholds of union power, and those unions are a key piece of the Democratic party’s base. A loss in today’s case would cut off a key funding stream, rolling back unions' organizing power as well as their political muscle.

The issue: Public-sector unions collect dues from their members; they also collect so-called “agency fees” from employees who choose not to join the union. Those fees can only support contract negotiations that apply to the whole workplace — not political actives for unions.

  • The court upheld that breakdown in the 70s, but now appears to be on the verge of overruling its earlier decision and striking down agency fees altogether.
  • Critics say that because these are government employees, even their collective bargaining is inherently political. Bargaining for higher wages, in this case, is bargaining for higher government spending.
  • And so, critics argue, forcing non-members to pay the unions a fee is forcing them to make a political statement, and a violation of their First Amendment rights. The justices heard an hour of oral arguments this morning on that question alone.

What they’re saying: Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court’s traditional swing vote, took the hardest line against agency fees today, casting them as “compelled subsidization of a private party that expresses political views constantly.”

  • At one point, Kennedy asked whether a ruling against agency fees would diminish unions’ political power. The answer was yes. “Isn’t that the end of this case?” he asked.

The odds: The court considered a nearly identical case in 2016. Due to the death of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, it deadlocked 4-4.

  • None of those eight justices seems to have changed their mind since then. So, the final outcome may be up to Gorsuch, who didn’t show his hand today but is generally very conservative.
  • It’s hard to imagine Gorsuch joining the court’s four liberals in a full-throated defense of public-sector unions. But if he is disinclined to overrule one of the court’s own precedents, he could steer this case toward a narrower decision that might limit agency fees while leaving some version of them intact.
  • That might be the best unions could hope for, and a 5-4 decision striking down their fees altogether is still a distinct possibility.

Go deeper

Fund managers start to board the stock bandwagon

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Asset managers at major U.S. investment firms are starting to get bullish with their clients, encouraging stock buying and trying not to get left behind right as the metrics on tech stocks rise back to highs not seen since the dot-com crash of 2000.

What's happening: Appetite for stocks is starting to return, but slowly as institutional money managers were overwhelmingly sitting on the sidelines in cash during April and May.

1 hour ago - World

China bans Cruz and Rubio over Xinjiang criticism

Photos: Graeme Jennings/Pool/Getty Images; Al Drago/Pool/Getty Images

China said Monday that it will ban entry to Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) over their criticisms of human rights abuses in Xinjiang, the AP reports.

The big picture: The move seems to be retaliatory after the U.S. announced sanctions on four Chinese officials for human rights abuses against Uighur Muslims and other ethnic minorities in the region last week.

Roger Stone says he plans to campaign for Trump

Roger Stone appears yesterday outside his home in Fort Lauderdale. Photo: Johnny Louis/Getty Images

Roger Stone told Axios in a phone interview that he plans to write and speak for President Trump's re-election now that Stone "won't die in a squalid hellhole of corona-19 virus."

"I'm asthmatic," said Stone, 67. "Sending me to a prison where I could not be socially distanced ... would, I think, be a death sentence."