Wind turbines near Palm Springs, Calif. Photo: Robert Alexander/Getty Images

Requirements that utilities purchase a share of their electricity from renewable sources may carry costs that outweigh their benefits, according to the preliminary findings of a working paper by University of Chicago economists.

The big picture: A complete accounting of the benefits of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) would paint a different picture, however. The study’s methods provide little clear policy guidance, and its findings about such standards — now in place in 29 states and Washington, D.C. — warrant skepticism.

What's new: The study attempts a complete estimate of the costs of these standards, which have helped kickstart the wind and solar industries. Its authors found that because RPS policies on average cost ratepayers $130 or more per ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduced, “the current costs of RPS programs exceed their benefits.”

  • Yes, but: The accuracy of that cost estimate aside, this approach misrepresents the objectives of RPS policies, which aren’t all about CO2 and are not intended to stand-in for carbon pricing. Lower air pollution and cheaper renewable energy are also important benefits, for example.

Between the lines: The paper has yet to go through formal peer review and likely revision, but at this stage raises two methodological concerns.

  1. It treats all RPS policies as the same and tries to estimate their average effect. In reality, each policy is unique in structure, stringency, definitions of eligible resources and requirements for specific technologies. That’s like treating 29 patients with different doses of similar but distinct drugs and trying to say something about the average effect.
  2. RPS policies are not the only factors likely to affect electricity rates. Beyond controlling for 3 specific measures, the paper doesn’t offer a way to distinguish the effect of an RPS from any other policy or time-varying trend. That poses problems, since many passed as part of sweeping restructurings of state electricity sectors or were followed by additional policy changes.

What’s next: Now that renewable energy technologies are mature, policymakers can make their clean energy goals even more cost-effective by replacing RPS policies with more aggressive and flexible Clean Electricity Standards (CES).

The bottom line: These factors make CES policies more cost-effective, which explains in part why California, Washington, New Mexico and other states have begun to adopt them on the path toward 100% carbon-free electricity. That ought to please economists, even if it falls short of their ideal: a robust price on carbon.

Jesse Jenkins is a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School and the Harvard University Center for the Environment.

Go deeper

Updated 36 mins ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 8 a.m. ET: 31,920, 652 — Total deaths: 977,311 — Total recoveries: 22,002,729Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 8 a.m ET: 6,935,414 — Total deaths: 201,920 — Total recoveries: 2,670,256 — Total tests: 97,459,742Map.
  3. Health: CDC director says over 90% of Americans have not yet been exposed to coronavirus — Supply shortages continue to plague testing — The coronavirus is surging again.
  4. Politics: Missouri Gov. Mike Parson tests positive for coronavirus — Poll says 51% of Republicans trust Trump on coronavirus more than the CDC.
  5. Technology: The tech solutions of 2020 may be sapping our resolve to beat the coronavirus
  6. Vaccines: Johnson & Johnson begins large phase 3 trial — The FDA plans to toughen standards.
  7. World: Justin Trudeau says Canada's second wave has begun
  8. Future: America's halfway coronavirus response
Dion Rabouin, author of Markets
42 mins ago - Economy & Business

The stock market's not-enough tantrum

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

The market looks like it may be throwing another tantrum, investors say. But the cause is different this time around.

What's happening: This selloff is beginning to look like the 2013 taper tantrum, which roiled markets as U.S. government yields rose in response to an expected reduction of the Fed's quantitative easing (QE) program.

48 mins ago - Sports

Checking in on college hoops

Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios

No sport was impacted by the onset of COVID-19 more than college basketball, which saw the cancellation of March Madness. Now, we've come full circle, with details emerging about the upcoming campaign.

Where things stand: The season will begin a few weeks later than normal on Nov. 25, with the non-conference slate comprised mostly of multi-team events.

Get Axios AM in your inbox

Catch up on coronavirus stories and special reports, curated by Mike Allen everyday

Please enter a valid email.

Subscription failed
Thank you for subscribing!