A factory in Newark, New Jersey. Photo: Kena Betancur/VIEWpress/Corbis via Getty Images

The Environmental Protection Agency released an annual report Wednesday that concludes 2016 greenhouse gas emissions are 2% lower than the previous year and 11% lower than 2005.

What they're saying: EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said on Twitter that the report's findings aren't a result of the Obama administration’s "top-down" regulations, like a rule that cuts carbon emissions from power plants or the "misguided" 2015 Paris climate deal. Instead, Pruitt said “American ingenuity and tech breakthroughs have made US the world leader in energy dominance while reducing emissions.”

The facts

One overarching point: This data is all drawn from the time of the Obama administration, not when Trump was in office.

More specifically, emissions are largely down because natural gas is displacing coal electricity, which the EPA notes. Power-plant carbon emissions are down by 25% compared to 2005 levels. But the agency doesn’t mention a couple of other important points:

1) Gas displacing coal contradicts President Trump’s broader goal of reviving coal.

2)Increasing wind and solar electricity is also helping cut emissions.

As for taking a shot at Obama’s carbon rule and the Paris climate deal, that’s beside the point. Power companies are increasingly moving toward natural gas and renewables because the economics make sense, less so because of the carbon rule (which Pruitt is working to repeal). And the global thrust of the Paris climate deal still exists, and it’s helping solidify an already economically compelling case to shift away from coal in the U.S.

Why it matters

This EPA report is the latest in a series of instances that shows how the Trump administration contradicts itself when it comes to energy and climate change: Pruitt boasts that America is reducing its carbon emissions, but he doesn’t acknowledge carbon is an issue.

More fundamentally, this report shows that despite the regulatory rollbacks and accompanying rhetoric, Trump’s EPA is keeping intact certain climate protocol that’s been in place since the 1990’s.

Correction: The first sentence has been changed to specify all greenhouse gas emissions, not just from power plants.

Go deeper

Updated 3 hours ago - Politics & Policy

Coronavirus dashboard

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

  1. Global: Total confirmed cases as of 7 p.m. ET: 12,859,834 — Total deaths: 567,123 — Total recoveries — 7,062,085Map.
  2. U.S.: Total confirmed cases as of 7 p.m. ET: 3,297,501— Total deaths: 135,155 — Total recoveries: 1,006,326 — Total tested: 40,282,176Map.
  3. States: Florida smashes single-day record for new coronavirus cases with over 15,000 — NYC reports zero coronavirus deaths for first time since pandemic hit.
  4. Public health: Ex-FDA chief projects "apex" of South's coronavirus curve in 2-3 weeks — Coronavirus testing czar: Lockdowns in hotspots "should be on the table"
  5. Education: Betsy DeVos says schools that don't reopen shouldn't get federal funds — Pelosi accuses Trump of "messing with the health of our children."

Scoop: How the White House is trying to trap leakers

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

President Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, has told several White House staffers he's fed specific nuggets of information to suspected leakers to see if they pass them on to reporters — a trap that would confirm his suspicions. "Meadows told me he was doing that," said one former White House official. "I don't know if it ever worked."

Why it matters: This hunt for leakers has put some White House staffers on edge, with multiple officials telling Axios that Meadows has been unusually vocal about his tactics. So far, he's caught only one person, for a minor leak.

11 GOP congressional nominees support QAnon conspiracy

Lauren Boebert posing in her restaurant in Rifle, Colorado, on April 24. Photo: Emily Kask/AFP

At least 11 Republican congressional nominees have publicly supported or defended the QAnon conspiracy theory movement or some of its tenets — and more aligned with the movement may still find a way onto ballots this year.

Why it matters: Their progress shows how a fringe online forum built on unsubstantiated claims and flagged as a threat by the FBI is seeking a foothold in the U.S. political mainstream.