/2024/09/10/1725982911008.gif?w=3840)
Illustration: Rebecca Zisser/Axios
The China biotech crackdown cleared a major milestone last night when it passed the House — but it no longer has quite the bipartisan gloss that it had in committee.
Why it matters: The Democratic divide that was apparent during the vote could complicate the Biosecure Act's prospects in the Senate, even though it still has plenty of momentum.
Driving the news: The measure to cut off certain Chinese biotech companies from U.S. government funding got a big vote, 306-81, but that is a far cry from the 40-1 tally coming out of the House Oversight Committee.
- 79 Democrats voted against the measure on the floor.
- Rep. Jim McGovern, an influential Democrat and ranking member of the Rules Committee, led the opposition, arguing the bill singled out the companies without due process.
- Notably, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries also voted no. Without his support, it is harder to get the bill into a must-pass vehicle like the National Defense Authorization Act.
What they're saying: GOP sponsor Rep. Brad Wenstrup did not sound eager to make changes to address McGovern's concerns in an interview with Axios this morning.
- Asked if he thinks there is a need to make changes, Wenstrup said of McGovern: "He does."
- "We're all willing to listen, but the bottom line is I felt the good work of the bipartisan select subcommittee on China was insulted," Wenstrup added.
- McGovern said on the House floor yesterday that he is open to getting to yes, but wants to make sure there is a "thorough investigation" before companies are placed on the list where they are cut off from U.S. government funding.
What's next: There was strong support for companion legislation in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. But despite an 11-1 vote to advance that bill, Ranking Member Rand Paul raised similar concerns about singling out companies.
- Wenstrup said he hopes members of the Senate Intelligence Committee can help make the case to the rest of the chamber to move the bill.
- And he said he thinks it should be brought up as a standalone measure. "Why does everything have to be in a must-pass [vehicle]?"
